Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31299961›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2019

Impact of genome architecture on the functional activation and repression of Hox regulatory landscapes.

Eddie Rodríguez-Carballo, Lucille Lopez-Delisle, Nayuta Yakushiji-Kaminatsui, Asier Ullate-Agote, Denis Duboule

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Transcriptional Regulation and Implications for ControllingJournal of developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Chromatin topology and the timing of enhancer function at theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  13. The regulatory landscapes of developmental genes.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2020
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eddie Rodríguez-CarballoLaboratory of Developmental Genomics, Department of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, 1211, Geneva 4, Switzerland.
Lucille Lopez-DelisleSchool of Life Sciences, Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Nayuta Yakushiji-KaminatsuiSchool of Life Sciences, Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Asier Ullate-AgoteLaboratory of Artificial and Natural Evolution, Department of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, 1211, Geneva 4, Switzerland.
Denis DubouleLaboratory of Developmental Genomics, Department of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, 1211, Geneva 4, Switzerland. Denis.Duboule@unige.ch.
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CHUniversity of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe spatial organization of the mammalian genome relies upon the formation of chromatin domains of various scales. At the level of gene regulation in cis, collections of enhancer sequences define large regulatory landscapes that usually match with the presence of topologically associating domains (TADs). These domains often contain ranges of enhancers displaying similar or related tissue specificity, suggesting that in some cases, such domains may act as coherent regulatory units, with a global on or off state. By using the HoxD gene cluster, which specifies the topology of the developing limbs via highly orchestrated regulation of gene expression, as a paradigm, we investigated how the arrangement of regulatory domains determines their activity and function.

resultsProximal and distal cells in the developing limb express different levels of Hoxd genes, regulated by flanking 3' and 5' TADs, respectively. We characterized the effect of large genomic rearrangements affecting these two TADs, including their fusion into a single chromatin domain. We show that, within a single hybrid TAD, the activation of both proximal and distal limb enhancers globally occurred as when both TADs are intact. However, the activity of the 3' TAD in distal cells is generally increased in the fused TAD, when compared to wild type where it is silenced. Also, target gene activity in distal cells depends on whether or not these genes had previously responded to proximal enhancers, which determines the presence or absence of H3K27me3 marks. We also show that the polycomb repressive complex 2 is mainly recruited at the Hox gene cluster and can extend its coverage to far-cis regulatory sequences as long as confined to the neighboring TAD structure.

conclusionsWe conclude that antagonistic limb proximal and distal enhancers can exert their specific effects when positioned into the same TAD and in the absence of their genuine target genes. We also conclude that removing these target genes reduced the coverage of a regulatory landscape by chromatin marks associated with silencing, which correlates with its prolonged activity in time.

Indexed as

GenomeAnimalsChromatinGene RearrangementGenes, HomeoboxMiceChromatinEnhancersGenome architecturePolycombRegulatory landscapesTADTetrapod evolution

Identifiers

PMID31299961
PMCPMC6626364
OpenAlexW2956429431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.