ArticleBMC biology2019
Impact of genome architecture on the functional activation and repression of Hox regulatory landscapes.
Article in BMC biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- A gene desert required for regulatory control of pleiotropic Shox2 expression and embryonic survival.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Epigenetic regulatory layers in the 3D nucleus.Molecular cell · 2024Review
- Topological structures and syntenic conservation in sea anemone genomes.Nature communications · 2023Article
- SMCHD1 has separable roles in chromatin architecture and gene silencing that could be targeted in disease.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Shared retinoic acid responsive enhancers coordinately regulate nascent transcription of Hoxb coding and non-coding RNAs in the developing mouse neural tube.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2023Article
- Transcriptional Regulation and Implications for ControllingJournal of developmental biology · 2022Review
- Changes in chromatin accessibility landscape and histone H3 core acetylation during valproic acid-induced differentiation of embryonic stem cells.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2021Article
- Control of tissue development and cell diversity by cell cycle-dependent transcriptional filtering.eLife · 2021Article
- Induction of a chromatin boundary in vivo upon insertion of a TAD border.PLoS genetics · 2021Article
- Co-Regulated Genes and Gene Clusters.Genes · 2021Review
- Chromatin topology and the timing of enhancer function at theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- The regulatory landscapes of developmental genes.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2020Review
- Chromatin topology, condensates and gene regulation: shifting paradigms or just a phase?Development (Cambridge, England) · 2019Review
- Impact of genome architecture on the functional activation and repression of Hox regulatory landscapes.BMC biology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe spatial organization of the mammalian genome relies upon the formation of chromatin domains of various scales. At the level of gene regulation in cis, collections of enhancer sequences define large regulatory landscapes that usually match with the presence of topologically associating domains (TADs). These domains often contain ranges of enhancers displaying similar or related tissue specificity, suggesting that in some cases, such domains may act as coherent regulatory units, with a global on or off state. By using the HoxD gene cluster, which specifies the topology of the developing limbs via highly orchestrated regulation of gene expression, as a paradigm, we investigated how the arrangement of regulatory domains determines their activity and function.
resultsProximal and distal cells in the developing limb express different levels of Hoxd genes, regulated by flanking 3' and 5' TADs, respectively. We characterized the effect of large genomic rearrangements affecting these two TADs, including their fusion into a single chromatin domain. We show that, within a single hybrid TAD, the activation of both proximal and distal limb enhancers globally occurred as when both TADs are intact. However, the activity of the 3' TAD in distal cells is generally increased in the fused TAD, when compared to wild type where it is silenced. Also, target gene activity in distal cells depends on whether or not these genes had previously responded to proximal enhancers, which determines the presence or absence of H3K27me3 marks. We also show that the polycomb repressive complex 2 is mainly recruited at the Hox gene cluster and can extend its coverage to far-cis regulatory sequences as long as confined to the neighboring TAD structure.
conclusionsWe conclude that antagonistic limb proximal and distal enhancers can exert their specific effects when positioned into the same TAD and in the absence of their genuine target genes. We also conclude that removing these target genes reduced the coverage of a regulatory landscape by chromatin marks associated with silencing, which correlates with its prolonged activity in time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.