Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31299956›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2019

Palliative care for people with substance use disorder and multiple problems: a qualitative study on experiences of patients and proxies.

Anne Ebenau, Boukje Dijkstra, Chantal Ter Huurne, Jeroen Hasselaar, Kris Vissers, Marieke Groot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anne EbenauDepartment of Anaesthesiology Pain and Palliative Care Expertise Centre for Palliative Care, Internal Post 549, Radboud University Medical Centre (Radboudumc), P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Anne.Ebenau@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8827-8725
Boukje DijkstraNijmegen Institute for Scientist-Practitioners in Addiction (NISPA), Radboud Universiteit, Postbus 9104, 6500 HE, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Chantal Ter HuurneTactus Addiction Care, Location Ripperdastraat, Ripperdastraat 8, 7511 JR, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Jeroen HasselaarDepartment of Anaesthesiology Pain and Palliative Care Expertise Centre for Palliative Care, Internal Post 549, Radboud University Medical Centre (Radboudumc), P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Kris VissersDepartment of Anaesthesiology Pain and Palliative Care Expertise Centre for Palliative Care, Internal Post 549, Radboud University Medical Centre (Radboudumc), P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Marieke GrootDepartment of Anaesthesiology Pain and Palliative Care Expertise Centre for Palliative Care, Internal Post 549, Radboud University Medical Centre (Radboudumc), P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

Salvation Army fund-raising NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSystematic research into palliative care (PC) for people with substance use disorder (SUD) and multiple problems is scarce. The existing literature shows problems in the organizational structure of this care, e.g., lack of clear care pathways. Furthermore, negative attitudes of healthcare professionals (HCPs) and stigmatization surrounding SUD, and patients' care-avoidance and non-disclosure of substance use are hindering factors in providing timely and person-centered PC. Furthermore, the experiences and needs of patients and proxies themselves are unknown. Therefore, this study aims to explore which problems and needs patients with SUD and multiple problems, and their proxies, experience in a PC phase.

methodsData-collection of this qualitative study consisted of semi-structured interviews with patients with SUD and multiple problems in a PC phase, and their proxies, about their experiences in PC and their well-being. Interviews were inductively analyzed.

resultsNine patients and three proxies were included. Six patients suffered from COPD, one patient from cirrhosis of the liver and two patients from both. Seven patients stayed in a nursing home and two had a room in either a social care service (hostel) or an assisted living home where medical care was provided. Five themes were identified: 1) healthcare delivery (including HCPs behaviour and values); 2) end-of-life (EOL) preferences (mostly concerning only the individual patient and the 'here-and-the-now'); 3) multidimensional problems; 4) coping (active and passive) and; 5) closed communication. Proxies' experiences with healthcare differed. Emotionally, they were all burdened by their histories with the patients.

conclusionsThis study shows that talking about and anticipating on PC with this patient-group appears hard due to patients' closed and avoiding communication. Furthermore, some of patients' EOL-preferences and needs, and coping-strategies, seem to differ from the more generally-accepted ideas and practices. Therefore, educating HCPs in communicating with this patient-group, is needed.

Indexed as

CaregiversHealth PersonnelHumansPalliative CarePatientsPatient SatisfactionQualitative ResearchSubstance-Related DisordersAddictionEnd-of-lifePalliative carePatientsProxiesQualitative studySubstance use disorderTerminal care

Identifiers

PMID31299956
PMCPMC6626397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.