Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31299743›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of craniofacial surgery2019

Sonolucent Cranial Implants: Cadaveric Study and Clinical Findings Supporting Diagnostic and Therapeutic Transcranioplasty Ultrasound.

Micah Belzberg, Netanel Ben Shalom, Edward Yuhanna, Amir Manbachi, Aylin Tekes, Judy Huang, Henry Brem, Chad R Gordon

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of craniofacial surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06127615 (The Efficacy of the Longeviti ClearFit Implant in Craniectomies for Post-Operative Monitoring in Chronic Subdural Hematomas), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06127615 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Efficacy of the Longeviti ClearFit Implant in Craniectomies for Post-Operative Monitoring in Chronic Subdural Hematomas

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Kansas Medical CenterRan2024 to 2025Enrolled0ConditionsChronic Subdural HematomaArmsClearFit
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Micah BelzbergDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Netanel Ben ShalomDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Edward YuhannaDepartment of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.
Amir ManbachiDepartment of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.
Aylin TekesDivision of Pediatric Radiology and Pediatric Neuroradiology, The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Judy HuangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Henry BremDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Chad R GordonDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USJohns Hopkins Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreviously, sonographic evaluation of the intracranial contents was limited to intraoperative use following bone flap removal, with placement of the probe directly on the cortical surface or through a transsulcal tubular retractor. Cranioplasty with sonolucent implants may represent a postoperative window into the brain by allowing ultrasound to serve as a novel bedside imaging modality. The potential sonolucency of various commonly used cranial implant types was examined in this study.

methodsA 3-phase study was comprised of cadaveric evaluation of transcranioplasty ultrasound (TCU) with cranioplasty implants of varying materials, intraoperative TCU during right-sided cranioplasty with clear implant made of poly-methyl-methacrylate (PMMA), and bedside TCU on postoperative day 5 after cranioplasty.

resultsThe TCU through clear PMMA, polyether-ether-ketone, and opaque PMMA cranial implants revealed implant sonoluceny, in contrast to autologous bone and porous-polyethylene. Intraoperative ultrasound via the clear PMMA implant in a single patient revealed recognizable ventricular anatomy. Furthermore, postoperative bedside ultrasound in the same patient revealed comparable ventricular anatomy and a small epidural fluid collection corresponding to that visualized on an axial computed tomography scan.

conclusionSonolucent cranial implants, such as those made of clear PMMA, hold great promise for enhanced diagnostic and therapeutic applications previously limited by cranial bone. Furthermore, as functional cranial implants are manufactured with implantable devices housed within clear PMMA, the possibility of utilizing ultrasound for real-time surveillance of intracranial pathology becomes much more feasible.

Indexed as

Prostheses and ImplantsAdultCadaverHumansMalePolymethyl MethacrylatePorosityPostoperative PeriodSkullTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonic TherapyPolymethyl Methacrylate

Identifiers

PMID31299743
PMCPMC7329202
OpenAlexW2945600265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.