Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31299173›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of cell and developmental biology2019

Whole-Cell Models and Simulations in Molecular Detail.

Michael Feig, Yuji Sugita

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of cell and developmental biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. KIMMDY: a biomolecular reaction emulator.Nature communications · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Molecular Crowding by Computational Approaches.Sub-cellular biochemistry · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Docking-based long timescale simulation of cell-size protein systems at atomic resolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael FeigDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA; email: mfeiglab@gmail.com.
Yuji SugitaLaboratory for Biomolecular Function Simulation, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, Kobe, Hyogo 650-0047, Japan.

Funding

Modeling and dynamics of biomolecules on cellular scalesR35GM126948 · NIGMS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Michael Feig · 2018 to 2026
$3.2M
CHARMM Modernization, Performance, and Continued DevelopmentR01GM103695 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BROOKS, CHARLES L · 2012 to 2018
$3.1M
Protein structure refinement through effective sampling and scoringR01GM084953 · NIGMS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI FEIG, MICHAEL · 2008 to 2017
$2.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM084953NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM103695NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM126948
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comprehensive data about the composition and structure of cellular components have enabled the construction of quantitative whole-cell models. While kinetic network-type models have been established, it is also becoming possible to build physical, molecular-level models of cellular environments. This review outlines challenges in constructing and simulating such models and discusses near- and long-term opportunities for developing physical whole-cell models that can connect molecular structure with biological function.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsComputer SimulationEukaryotic CellsHumansMolecular Dynamics SimulationSoftwarecrowdingmolecular dynamics simulationnetwork modelsprotein structuresystems biology

Identifiers

PMID31299173
PMCPMC6783340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.