Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31299122›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2019

Intrinsically disordered domains: Sequence ➔ disorder ➔ function relationships.

Jianhong Zhou, Christopher J Oldfield, Wenying Yan, Bairong Shen, A Keith Dunker

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Intrinsically Disordered Proteins: An Overview.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Peptide array-based interactomics.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jianhong ZhouCenter for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Christopher J OldfieldDepartment of Computer Science, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.ORCID 0000-0002-3362-2047
Wenying YanSchool of Biology & Basic Medical Sciences, Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Bairong ShenInstitutes for Systems Genetics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
A Keith DunkerCenter for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Soochow University · CNIndiana University School of MedicineSichuan University · CNVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disordered domains are long regions of intrinsic disorder that ideally have conserved sequences, conserved disorder, and conserved functions. These domains were first noticed in protein-protein interactions that are distinct from the interactions between two structured domains and the interactions between structured domains and linear motifs or molecular recognition features (MoRFs). So far, disordered domains have not been systematically characterized. Here, we present a bioinformatics investigation of the sequence-disorder-function relationships for a set of probable disordered domains (PDDs) identified from the Pfam database. All the Pfam seed proteins from those domains with at least one PDD sequence were collected. Most often, if a set contains one PDD sequence, then all members of the set are PDDs or nearly so. However, many seed sets have sequence collections that exhibit diverse proportions of predicted disorder and structure, thus giving the completely unexpected result that conserved sequences can vary substantially in predicted disorder and structure. In addition to the induction of structure by binding to protein partners, disordered domains are also induced to form structure by disulfide bond formation, by ion binding, and by complex formation with RNA or DNA. The two new findings, (a) that conserved sequences can vary substantially in their predicted disorder content and (b) that homologues from a single domain can evolve from structure to disorder (or vice versa), enrich our understanding of the sequence ➔ disorder ensemble ➔ function paradigm.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceComputational BiologyConserved SequenceDatabases, ProteinModels, MolecularProtein ConformationProteinsProtein UnfoldingSequence Homology, Amino AcidStructure-Activity RelationshipProteinsdisorder-function relationshipsdisorder-to-structure transitionsintrinsically disordered domains

Identifiers

PMID31299122
PMCPMC6699093
OpenAlexW2956397917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.