Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31299050›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2019

Multilevel regulation of the glass locus during Drosophila eye development.

Cornelia Fritsch, F Javier Bernardo-Garcia, Tim-Henning Humberg, Abhishek Kumar Mishra, Sara Miellet, Silvia Almeida, Michael V Frochaux, Bart Deplancke, Armin Huber, Simon G Sprecher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Understanding small ORF diversity through a comprehensive transcription feature classification.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Cornelia FritschDepartment of Biology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2964-573X
F Javier Bernardo-GarciaDepartment of Biology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8945-4919
Tim-Henning HumbergDepartment of Biology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2824-2453
Abhishek Kumar MishraDepartment of Biology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8256-6379
Sara MielletDepartment of Biology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1400-9711
Silvia AlmeidaDepartment of Biology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Michael V FrochauxLaboratory of Systems Biology, IBI, SV, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4347-5562
Bart DeplanckeLaboratory of Systems Biology, IBI, SV, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9935-843X
Armin HuberInstitute of Physiology, University of Hohenheim, Hohenheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3977-089X
Simon G SprecherDepartment of Biology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9060-3750

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Development of eye tissue is initiated by a conserved set of transcription factors termed retinal determination network (RDN). In the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, the zinc-finger transcription factor Glass acts directly downstream of the RDN to control identity of photoreceptor as well as non-photoreceptor cells. Tight control of spatial and temporal gene expression is a critical feature during development, cell-fate determination as well as maintenance of differentiated tissues. The molecular mechanisms that control expression of glass, however, remain largely unknown. We here identify complex regulatory mechanisms controlling expression of the glass locus. All information to recapitulate glass expression are contained in a compact 5.2 kb cis-acting genomic element by combining different cell-type specific and general enhancers with repressor elements. Moreover, the immature RNA of the locus contains an alternative small open reading frame (smORF) upstream of the actual glass translation start, resulting in a small peptide instead of the three possible Glass protein isoforms. CRISPR/Cas9-based mutagenesis shows that the smORF is not required for the formation of functioning photoreceptors, but is able to attenuate effects of glass misexpression. Furthermore, editing the genome to generate glass loci eliminating either one or two isoforms shows that only one of the three proteins is critical for formation of functioning photoreceptors, while removing the two other isoforms did not cause defects in developmental or photoreceptor function. Our results show that eye development and function is largely unaffected by targeted manipulations of critical features of the glass transcript, suggesting a strong selection pressure to allow the formation of a functioning eye.

Indexed as

Alternative SplicingAnimalsCell DifferentiationDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEnhancer Elements, GeneticEyeGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalMutagenesis, Site-DirectedPhotoreceptor CellsDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila Proteinsgl protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID31299050
PMCPMC6655844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.