Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31298784›Full record

Trial reportPsychiatry and clinical neurosciences2019

Nalmefene in alcohol-dependent patients with a high drinking risk: Randomized controlled trial.

Hisatsugu Miyata, Masayoshi Takahashi, Yoshiyuki Murai, Kana Tsuneyoshi, Takako Hayashi, Didier Meulien, Per Sørensen, Susumu Higuchi

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Alcohol-Related Liver Disease: Basic Mechanisms and Clinical Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Hisatsugu MiyataDepartment of Psychiatry, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Masayoshi TakahashiDepartment of Clinical Management, Clinical Development Headquarters, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshiyuki MuraiDepartment of Clinical Management, Clinical Development Headquarters, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Kana TsuneyoshiDepartment of Biometrics, Clinical Development Headquarters, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
Takako HayashiMedical Affairs, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9916-1784
Didier MeulienClinical Research and Development - Neurology, H. Lundbeck SAS, Issy-les-Moulineaux, Paris, France.
Per SørensenGlobal Analytics, H. Lundbeck, Valby, Denmark.
Susumu HiguchiNational Hospital Organization, Kurihama Medical and Addiction Center, Japan.
Otsuka (Japan) · JPJikei University School of Medicine · JPKurihama Medical and Addiction Center · JPLundbeck (Denmark) · DK

Funding

H. Lundbeck A/SOtsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsReducing alcohol consumption is one treatment approach for alcohol-dependent patients. This study compared nalmefene 20 mg and 10 mg with placebo, combined with psychosocial support, in alcohol-dependent Japanese patients with a high or very high drinking risk level (DRL).

methodsThis was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study conducted in alcohol-dependent patients with a high or very high DRL. Patients were randomized to 24 weeks of treatment with as-needed nalmefene 20 mg, 10 mg, or placebo with psychosocial support. The primary endpoint was change in heavy drinking days (HDD) from baseline to week 12. A key secondary endpoint was the change in total alcohol consumption (TAC) from baseline to week 12.

resultsAt week 12, 234, 206, and 154 patients who received placebo, nalmefene 20 mg, and 10 mg were included in the primary endpoint analysis. Compared with placebo, nalmefene was associated with significant reductions in HDD at week 12 (difference in 20 mg group, -4.34 days/month; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -6.05 to -2.62; P < 0.0001; difference in 10 mg group, -4.18 days/month; 95%CI: -6.05 to -2.32; P < 0.0001), as well as a significant reduction in TAC at week 12 (P < 0.0001). The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was 87.9%, 84.8%, and 79.2% in the groups receiving nalmefene 20 mg, 10 mg, and placebo, respectively. These events were mostly of mild or moderate severity.

conclusionsNalmefene 20 mg or 10 mg effectively reduced alcohol consumption and was well tolerated in alcohol-dependent patients with a high or very high DRL.

Indexed as

AdultAlcohol DeterrentsAlcohol DrinkingAlcoholismDouble-Blind MethodEndpoint DeterminationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNaltrexoneRiskTreatment OutcomeAlcohol DeterrentsnalmefeneNaltrexonealcohol dependencedrinking behaviordrug therapyopioidsafety

Identifiers

PMID31298784
PMCPMC6899457
OpenAlexW2959351025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.