Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31298715›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2019

The 3i Conceptual Framework for Recognizing Patient Perspectives of Type 1 Diabetes During Emerging Adulthood.

Benjamin Markowitz, Cheryl Pritlove, Geetha Mukerji, James V Lavery, Janet A Parsons, Andrew Advani

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Sustained Improvement in Glycemic Control in Emerging Adults with Type 1 Diabetes 2 Years After the Start of the COVID-19 Pandemic.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Benjamin MarkowitzApplied Health Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Cheryl PritloveApplied Health Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Geetha MukerjiWomen's College Hospital Institute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
James V LaveryHubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health and Center for Ethics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Janet A ParsonsApplied Health Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Andrew AdvaniKeenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science and Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
St. Michael's Hospital · CAEmory University · USWomen's College Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Early emerging adulthood, the developmental life stage roughly spanning between the ages of 18 and 24 years, can be a challenging time for individuals living with type 1 diabetes, being associated with an increased risk of acute complications, loss to follow-up, and the emergence of long-term diabetes complications. Few evidence-based interventions exist, and practice guidelines instead emphasize the importance of delivering individualized, developmentally appropriate care. Objective: To inform the provision of tailored care and education by illuminating the individual lived experiences of emerging adults with type 1 diabetes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative study used in-depth interviews conducted with 33 emerging adults living with type 1 diabetes between October 14, 2016, and May 16, 2017. Participants were recruited from 2 urban Young Adult Diabetes Clinics in the city of Toronto, Ontario, Canada, using a convenience sampling approach. Narrative analysis of participants' accounts was conducted inductively to define story typology. Main Outcomes and Measures: Participant accounts of type 1 diabetes during childhood, adolescence, and emerging adulthood. Results: Interviews were conducted with 33 participants aged 18 to 24 years (mean [SD] age at interview, 20.6 [1.7] years); 17 (51%) were women. Duration of diabetes ranged from 3 to 20 years (mean [SD] duration, 12.0 [4.8] years). Narrative analysis identified 3 distinct story types, or lenses, termed ingrained (n = 14), intrusive (n = 12), and inconspicuous (n = 7). Ingrained narratives portrayed an active integration of diabetes self-management into daily life. Intrusive narratives were characterized by stories of struggles for acceptance and striving for control. Inconspicuous narratives were differentiated by descriptions of a willingness to ignore diabetes and its attendant daily tasks with the goals of preserving normalcy and limiting distress. Mean levels of hemoglobin A1c were higher in participants conveying an intrusive lens narrative (mean [SD], 9.3% [1.6%]) than those conveying an ingrained lens (mean [SD], 7.4% [0.7%]) (difference between intrusive and ingrained, 1.9%; 95% CI, 0.8%-2.9%; P = .007) or an inconspicuous lens (mean [SD], 8.6% [1.5%]). Conclusions and Relevance: Although every person is unique, there are commonalities in how emerging adults perceive and depict their experiences living with type 1 diabetes. Among the emerging adults interviewed in the present study, the 3i conceptual framework of ingrained, intrusive, and inconspicuous lenses encapsulated these commonalities. Recognition of the different psychosocial contexts surrounding type 1 diabetes during emerging adulthood may help health care professionals individualize their care accordingly.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1FemaleHumansMaleOntarioPatient-Centered CareQualitative ResearchSelf-ManagementYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31298715
PMCPMC6628591
OpenAlexW2956198774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.