Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31298496›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2019

Optimizing responses to drug safety signals in pregnancy: the example of dolutegravir and neural tube defects.

Lynne M Mofenson, Anton L Pozniak, Jacque Wambui, Elliot Raizes, Andrea Ciaranello, Polly Clayden, Peter Ehrenkranz, Ade Fakoya, Andrew Hill, Saye Khoo and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Response to "Being prepared to evaluate pregnancy PrEP".Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 14 institutions in 5 countries.

Lynne M MofensonElizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2818-9808
Anton L PozniakChelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4091-5323
Jacque WambuiNational Empowerment Network of people living with HIV/AIDS in Kenya (NEPHAK), Nairobi, Kenya.
Elliot RaizesCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Andrea CiaranelloMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4268-3263
Polly ClaydenHIV i-Base, London, UK.
Peter EhrenkranzBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2028-4779
Ade FakoyaGlobal Fund, Geneva, Switzerland.
Andrew HillUniversity of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6494-7645
Saye KhooUniversity of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2769-0967
Imelda MahakaPangaea Zimbabwe AIDS Trust, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Surbhi ModiCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2143-672X
Cynthia MooreCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Andrew PhillipsUniversity College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2384-4807
George SiberryUS Agency for International Development, Arlington, VA, USA.
Kenly SikweseAfrican Community Advisory Board (AFROCAB), Luska, Zambia.
Claire ThorneUniversity College London Institute of Child Health, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0389-1956
Heather D WattsOffice of the US Global AIDS Coordinator, Washington, DC, USA.
Meg DohertyWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Nathan P FordWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8238-4228
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBWorld Health Organization · CHAdvisory Board Company (United States) · USAIDS United · USChelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBEcho Network Africa · KEElizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation · USFamily Aids Caring Trust · ZWGates Foundation · USGlobal Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria · CHMassachusetts General Hospital · USUnited States Agency for International Development · US

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L006758/1World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe unexpected identification of a neural tube defect (NTD) safety signal with preconception dolutegravir (DTG) exposure in the Botswana Tsepamo birth outcomes study brought into sharp focus the need for reliable data on use of new antiretrovirals in pregnancy, improved pharmacovigilance systems to evaluate safety of new drugs being introduced into populations including women of reproductive potential, and balanced risk-benefit messaging when a safety signal is identified. DISCUSSION: The Tsepamo study NTD safety signal and accompanying regulatory responses led to uncertainty about the most appropriate approach to DTG use among women of reproductive potential, affecting global DTG roll-out plans, and limiting DTG use in adolescent girls and women. It also revealed a tension between a public health approach to antiretroviral treatment (ART) and individual choice, and highlighted difficulties interpreting and messaging an unexpected safety signal with uncertainty about risk. This difficulty was compounded by the lack of high-quality data on pregnancy outcomes from women receiving ART outside the Tsepamo surveillance sites and countries other than Botswana, resulting in a prolonged period of uncertainty while data on additional exposures are evaluated to refute or confirm the initial safety signal. We discuss principles for evaluating and introducing new drugs in the general population that would ensure collection of appropriate data to inform drug safety in adolescent girls and women of reproductive potential and minimize confusion about drug use in this population when a safety signal is identified.

conclusionsThe response to a signal suggesting a possible safety risk for a drug used in pregnancy or among women who may become pregnant needs to be rapid and comprehensive. It requires the existence of appropriately designed surveillance systems with broad population coverage; data analyses that examine risk-benefit trade-offs in a variety of contexts; guidance to transform this risk-benefit balance into effective and agreed-upon policy; involvement of the affected community and other key stakeholders; and a communication plan for all levels of knowledge and complexity. Implementation of this proposed framework for responding to safety signals is needed to ensure that any drug used in pregnancy can be rapidly and appropriately evaluated should a serious safety alert arise.

Indexed as

AdolescentAnti-HIV AgentsBotswanaDolutegravirFemaleHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansNeural Tube DefectsOxazinesPiperazinesPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPyridonesRisk AssessmentAnti-HIV AgentsDolutegravirHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingOxazinesPiperazinesPyridonesARVhealth systemsneural tube defectspericonceptionpharmacovigilancetreatmentwomen

Identifiers

PMID31298496
PMCPMC6625340
OpenAlexW2960767487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.