Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31298436›Full record

ArticleProteins2019

Prediction of interresidue contacts with DeepMetaPSICOV in CASP13.

Shaun M Kandathil, Joe G Greener, David T Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteins, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Protein Structure Prediction Methods.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Contact-Assisted Threading in Low-Homology Protein Modeling.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Benchmarking AlphaFold for protein complex modeling reveals accuracy determinants.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2022
    Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shaun M KandathilDepartment of Computer Science, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2671-2140
Joe G GreenerDepartment of Computer Science, University College London, London, UK.
David T JonesDepartment of Computer Science, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

European Research Council 695558
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this article, we describe our efforts in contact prediction in the CASP13 experiment. We employed a new deep learning-based contact prediction tool, DeepMetaPSICOV (or DMP for short), together with new methods and data sources for alignment generation. DMP evolved from MetaPSICOV and DeepCov and combines the input feature sets used by these methods as input to a deep, fully convolutional residual neural network. We also improved our method for multiple sequence alignment generation and included metagenomic sequences in the search. We discuss successes and failures of our approach and identify areas where further improvements may be possible. DMP is freely available at: https://github.com/psipred/DeepMetaPSICOV.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyProtein ConformationAlgorithmsAmino Acid SequenceDeep LearningMachine LearningMetagenomeNeural Networks, ComputerProteinsSequence Analysis, ProteinProteinsdeep learningmachine learningmetagenomicsneural networksprotein contact predictionprotein structure prediction

Identifiers

PMID31298436
PMCPMC6899903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.