Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31298299›Full record

SynthesisAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2019

Role of Women's Empowerment in Child Nutrition Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Marianne V Santoso, Rachel Bezner Kerr, John Hoddinott, Priya Garigipati, Sophia Olmos, Sera L Young

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marianne V SantosoDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Rachel Bezner KerrDepartment of Development Sociology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
John HoddinottDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Priya GarigipatiDepartment of Anthropology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Sophia OlmosDepartment of Anthropology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Sera L YoungDepartment of Anthropology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.

Funding

Health Consequences of Food & Nutrition Insecurity for HIV+ Women & Their InfantsK01MH098902 · NIMH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI YOUNG, SERA LEWISE · 2012 to 2016
$854k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH098902
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Women's empowerment has gained attention as critical for child nutrition during the first 1000 days of life. However, the ways in which various women's empowerment measures are applied and the evidence for how they are differentially related to child nutrition is unclear. In this systematic review, therefore, we 1) systematically parse the many ways in which women's empowerment has been quantitatively measured in the context of child nutrition through the use of a theoretically driven application of dimensions and domains of empowerment; 2) summarize evidence for each of the various pathways between women's empowerment and child nutrition, based on dimensions and domains of empowerment; and 3) offer suggestions for future research to better articulate the relationship between women's empowerment and child nutrition. A search of evidence yielded 62 quantitative studies that used 200 unique indicators of women's empowerment, tested in 1316 associations with various child nutrition outcomes. Despite the large number of unique indicators, indicators for time resource allocation and reproductive decisions and indicators for men's engagement in child care and nutrition, all pertinent to child nutrition, were missing. Overall, the findings indicated an inconclusive relationship between women's empowerment and child nutrition: 379 out of 461 (82% weighted) and 217 out of 258 (84% weighted) associations found with stunting and wasting outcomes, respectively, were not significant. The current lack of evidence is likely not due to the absence of an underlying relationship between women's empowerment and child nutrition, but rather limitations in study design. Future research should carefully select women's empowerment indicators in context-specific ways, aggregate them meaningfully, and use a longitudinal study design to conduct pathway and lifecycle analysis in appropriate populations to clarify the relationship between women's empowerment and child nutrition.

Indexed as

Child HealthChild Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaDietEmpowermentMothersNutritional StatusWomen's RightsAdultChildChild, PreschoolFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansInfantWomenempowermentgender equityinfant and young child feedingnutrition-sensitivesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID31298299
PMCPMC6855975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.