Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31298292›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2019

Relation to enterocins and herbal extracts of fecal hemolytic Escherichia coli from domestic ducks detected with MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry.

J Ščerbová, A Kandričáková, Ľ Hamarová, A Lauková

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J ŠčerbováInstitute of Animal Physiology, Centre of Biosciences of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Šoltésovej 4-6, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia.
A KandričákováInstitute of Animal Physiology, Centre of Biosciences of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Šoltésovej 4-6, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia.
Ľ HamarováInstitute of Animal Physiology, Centre of Biosciences of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Šoltésovej 4-6, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia.
A LaukováInstitute of Animal Physiology, Centre of Biosciences of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Šoltésovej 4-6, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surveillance studies have generally reported an increase in Escherichia coli strains resistant to major classes of antibiotics used for animals' treatment. The aim of this study was to test the susceptibility of 25 strains (isolated from 30 domestic Mallard ducks-Anas platyrhynchos, both sex, aged 8 to 14 wk, taxonomically alloted to the species E. coli using MALDI TOF mass spectrometry system) to antimicrobials (antibiotics, enterocins, and herbal extracts). Testing was performed using the agar disc method and the agar diffusion method. A total of 19 E. coli strains were multiresistant to antibiotics; but 10 of those strains were susceptible to enterocins with an inhibition activity of 100 AU/mL. All strains were susceptible to herbal extracts. These results indicate further benefit application of enterocins and herbal extracts to prevent/reduce problems caused with E. coli. Moreover, additional studies are in process.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBridged-Ring CompoundsDucksEscherichia coliFecesPlant ExtractsSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationAnti-Bacterial AgentsBridged-Ring CompoundsenterocinPlant ExtractsantimicrobialsducksEscherichia coliresistancesusceptibility

Identifiers

PMID31298292
PMCPMC6771762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.