ArticleInternational journal of epidemiology2019
Commentary: Orienting causal relationships between two phenotypes using bidirectional Mendelian randomization.
Article in International journal of epidemiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Review of Mendelian Randomization: Assumptions, Methods, and Application to Obesity-Related Diseases.Journal of obesity & metabolic syndrome · 2025Review
- Association of Body Mass Index and Parkinson Disease: A Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Study.Neurology · 2024Article
- Causal relationships between coffee intake, apolipoprotein B and gastric, colorectal, and esophageal cancers: univariable and multivariable Mendelian randomization.European journal of nutrition · 2024Article
- The Impact of Different Intensities of Physical Activity on Serum Urate and Gout: A Mendelian Randomization Study.Metabolites · 2024Article
- A Mendelian randomization study on the causal effects of cigarette smoking on liver fibrosis and cirrhosis.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- The bidirectional association between atrial fibrillation and myocardial infarction.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2023Review
- Exploring and mitigating potential bias when genetic instrumental variables are associated with multiple non-exposure traits in Mendelian randomization.European journal of epidemiology · 2022Article
- Robust inference of bi-directional causal relationships in presence of correlated pleiotropy with GWAS summary data.PLoS genetics · 2022Article
- Examining Health Outcomes in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Genetic Epidemiology Study.ACR open rheumatology · 2022Article
- Mendelian Randomization: Concepts and Scope.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2022Review
- No bidirectional relationship between depression and periodontitis: A genetic correlation and Mendelian randomization study.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Mendelian randomisation for psychiatry: how does it work, and what can it tell us?Molecular psychiatry · 2022Review
- Cholesterol Auxotrophy as a Targetable Vulnerability in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.Cancer discovery · 2021Article
- Evaluation of the causal effects of blood lipid levels on gout with summary level GWAS data: two-sample Mendelian randomization and mediation analysis.Journal of human genetics · 2021Article
- Lack of an association between gallstone disease and bilirubin levels with risk of colorectal cancer: a Mendelian randomisation analysis.British journal of cancer · 2021Article
- Causal Association Between Heart Failure and Alzheimer's Disease: A Two-Sample Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Study.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- A multivariable Mendelian randomization to appraise the pleiotropy between intelligence, education, and bipolar disorder in relation to schizophrenia.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31298278What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.