Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31298271›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2019

The impact of dietary supplementation of arginine during gestation in a commercial swine herd: I. Gilt reproductive performance.

Elizabeth A Hines, Matthew R Romoser, Zoë E Kiefer, Aileen F Keating, Lance H Baumgard, Jarad Niemi, Nicholas K Gabler, John F Patience, Benjamin Haberl, Noel H Williams and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects of Chlorogenic Acid-RichAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth A HinesDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
Matthew R RomoserDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
Zoë E KieferDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
Aileen F KeatingDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
Lance H BaumgardDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
Jarad NiemiDepartment of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
Nicholas K GablerDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
John F PatienceDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
Benjamin HaberlIowa Select Farms, Iowa Falls, IA.
Noel H WilliamsIowa Select Farms, Iowa Falls, IA.
Brian J KerrUSDA-ARS-National Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment, Ames, IA.
Kevin J TouchetteAjinomoto Animal Nutrition North America, Inc., Chicago, IL.
Jason W RossDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
Iowa State University · USAjinomoto (United States) · USNational Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Supplemental arginine (Arg) during gestation purportedly benefits fetal development. However, the benefits of a gestational Arg dietary strategy in commercial production are unclear. Therefore, the objectives of this study examined Arg supplementation during different gestational stages and the effects on gilt reproductive performance. Pubertal gilts (n = 548) were allocated into 4 treatment groups: Control (n = 143; 0% supplemental Arg) or 1 of 3 supplemental Arg (1% as fed) treatments: from 15 to 45 d of gestation (n = 138; Early-Arg); from 15 d of gestation until farrowing (n = 139; Full-Arg); or from 85 d of gestation until farrowing (n = 128; Late-Arg). At farrowing, the number of total born (TB), born alive (BA), stillborn piglets (SB), mummified fetuses (MM), and individual piglet birth weights (BiWt) were recorded. The wean-to-estrus interval (WEI) and subsequent sow reproductive performance (to third parity) were also monitored. No significant effect of supplemental Arg during any part of P0 gestation was observed for TB, BA, SB, or MM (P ≥ 0.29). Offspring BiWt and variation among individual piglet birth weights did not differ (P = 0.42 and 0.89, respectively) among treatment groups. Following weaning, the WEI was similar among treatments (average of 8.0 ± 0.8 d; P = 0.88). Litter performance over 3 parities revealed a decrease (P = 0.02) in BA for Early-Arg fed gilts compared with all other treatments, whereas TB and WEI were similar among treatments over 3 parities (P > 0.05). There was an increased proportion of sows with average size litters (12 to 16 TB) from the Full-Arg treatment sows (76.8% ± 3.7%) when compared with Control (58.7% ± 4.2%; P = 0.01); however, the proportion of sows with high (>16 TB) and low (<12 TB) litters was not different among treatments (P = 0.20). These results suggest that gestational Arg supplementation had a minimal impact on reproductive performance in first parity sows. These data underscore the complexity of AA supplementation and the need for continued research into understanding how and when utilizing a gestational dietary Arg strategy can optimize fetal development and sow performance.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsReproductionAnimalsArginineBirth WeightDietEstrusFemaleLitter SizeParityParturitionPregnancySwineWeaningArginineargininelitterpigproductionsowswine

Identifiers

PMID31298271
PMCPMC6736115
OpenAlexW2960723425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.