Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31298218›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2019

Influence of Scribes on Patient-Physician Communication in Primary Care Encounters: Mixed Methods Study.

Shivang U Danak, Timothy C Guetterman, Melissa A Plegue, Heather L Holmstrom, Reema Kadri, Alexander Duthler, Anne Yoo, Lorraine R Buis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Safe use of the EHR by medical scribes: a qualitative study.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
  6. Methods for Large-Scale Quantitative Analysis of Scribe Impacts on Clinical Documentation.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shivang U DanakDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0677-7921
Timothy C GuettermanDepartment of Interdisciplinary Studies, Creighton University, Omaha, NE, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0093-858X
Melissa A PlegueDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6032-534X
Heather L HolmstromDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8041-1261
Reema KadriDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0935-3761
Alexander DuthlerCollege of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5378-7957
Anne YooCollege of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8295-3144
Lorraine R BuisDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5855-9972

Funding

Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research (MICHR)UL1TR002240 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LUMENG, JULIE C, MASHOUR, GEORGE ALEXANDER · 2017 to 2022
$54.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the increasing adoption of electronic health record (EHR) systems, documentation-related burdens have been increasing for health care providers. Recent estimates indicate that primary care providers spend about one-half of their workdays interacting with the EHR, of which about half is focused on clerical tasks. To reduce documentation burdens associated with the EHR, health care systems and physician practices are increasingly implementing medical scribes to assist providers with real-time documentation. Scribes are typically unlicensed paraprofessionals who assist health care providers by documenting notes electronically under the direction of a licensed practitioner or physician in real time. Despite the promise of scribes, few studies have investigated their effect on clinical encounters, particularly with regard to patient-provider communication.

objectiveThe purpose of this quasi-experimental pilot study was to understand how scribes affect patient-physician communication in primary care clinical encounters.

methodsWe employed a convergent mixed methods design and included a sample of three physician-scribe pairs and 34 patients. Patients' clinical encounters were randomly assigned to a scribe or nonscribe group. We conducted patient surveys focused on perceptions of patient-provider communication and satisfaction with encounters, video recorded clinical encounters, and conducted physician interviews about their experiences with scribes.

resultsOverall, the survey results revealed that patients across both arms reported very high satisfaction of communication with their physician, their physician's use of the EHR, and their care, with very little variability. Video recording analysis supported patient survey data by demonstrating high measures of communication among physicians in both scribed and nonscribed encounters. Furthermore, video recordings revealed that the presence of scribes had very little effect on the clinical encounter.

conclusionsFrom the patient's perspective, scribes are an acceptable addition to clinical encounters. Although they do not have much impact on patients' perceptions of satisfaction and their impact on the clinical encounter itself was minimal, their potential to reduce documentation-related burden on physicians is valuable. Physicians noted important issues related to scribes, including important considerations for implementing scribe programs, the role of scribes in patient interactions, how physicians work with scribes, characteristics of good scribes, and the role of scribes in physician workflow.

Indexed as

documentationelectronic health recordsmedical informatics

Identifiers

PMID31298218
PMCPMC6657447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.