Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31297869›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2019

Regression analysis and variable selection for two-stage multiple-infection group testing data.

Juexin Lin, Dewei Wang, Qi Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Juexin LinDepartment of Statistics, University of South Carolina, South Carolina.
Dewei WangDepartment of Statistics, University of South Carolina, South Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-0822-8563
Qi ZhengDepartment of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, University of Louisville, Kentucky.

Funding

Flexible biomarker evaluation through a cost-effective data collection mechanismR03AI135614 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI WANG, DEWEI · 2019 to 2020
$147k
NIAID NIH HHS R03 AI135614
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Group testing, as a cost-effective strategy, has been widely used to perform large-scale screening for rare infections. Recently, the use of multiplex assays has transformed the goal of group testing from detecting a single disease to diagnosing multiple infections simultaneously. Existing research on multiple-infection group testing data either exclude individual covariate information or ignore possible retests on suspicious individuals. To incorporate both, we propose a new regression model. This new model allows us to perform a regression analysis for each infection using multiple-infection group testing data. Furthermore, we introduce an efficient variable selection method to reveal truly relevant risk factors for each disease. Our methodology also allows for the estimation of the assay sensitivity and specificity when they are unknown. We examine the finite sample performance of our method through extensive simulation studies and apply it to a chlamydia and gonorrhea screening data set to illustrate its practical usefulness.

Indexed as

Regression AnalysisChlamydia InfectionsComputer SimulationFemaleGonorrheaHumansMaleMass ScreeningRisk FactorsUnited Statesadaptive LASSOmultiplex assaypooled testingsensitivityspecificity

Identifiers

PMID31297869
PMCPMC6736686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.