Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31297704›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of clinical oncology2019

Efficacy of daikenchuto, a traditional Japanese Kampo medicine, for postoperative intestinal dysfunction in patients with gastrointestinal cancers: meta-analysis.

Masayoshi Hosaka, Ichiro Arai, Yoshihisa Ishiura, Tomohiro Ito, Yoshinobu Seki, Tateaki Naito, Yuko Masuzawa, Takeo Nakayama, Yoshiharu Motoo

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of clinical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Hangeshashinto for the prevention of oral mucositis in patients receiving chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Masayoshi HosakaDepartment of Health Informatics, Kyoto University School of Public Health, Yoshida Konoe, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan. hosaka.masayoshi.6c@kyoto-u.ac.jp.
Ichiro AraiDivision of Kampo Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nihon Pharmaceutical University, Saitama, 362-0806, Japan.
Yoshihisa IshiuraDepartment of Respiratory, Oncology and Allergy Medicine, Kansai Medical University Medical Center, Osaka, 570-8507, Japan.
Tomohiro ItoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Kanagawa, 224-8503, Japan.
Yoshinobu SekiDepartment of Hematology, Uonuma Institute of Community Medicine, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Niigata, 949-7302, Japan.
Tateaki NaitoDivision of Thoracic Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan.
Yuko MasuzawaDepartment of Health Informatics, Kyoto University School of Public Health, Yoshida Konoe, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
Takeo NakayamaDepartment of Health Informatics, Kyoto University School of Public Health, Yoshida Konoe, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
Yoshiharu MotooDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kanazawa Medical University, Ishikawa, 920-0293, Japan.
Kyoto University · JPKanazawa Medical University · JPKansai Medical University · JPNihon Pharmaceutical University · JPNiigata University Medical and Dental Hospital · JPShizuoka Cancer Center · JPShowa University Northern Yokohama Hospital · JP

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) Research Project for Improving Quality in Healthcare and Collecting Scientific Evidence on Integrative Medicine JP16lk0310023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Japan Society for Oriental Medicine makes a compilation of structured abstracts of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of Kampo medicines available on its Evidence Reports of Kampo Treatment (EKAT) website.

methodsUsing EKAT, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of using daikenchuto ( https://mpdb.nibiohn.go.jp/stork ) for bowel dysfunction after surgery for gastrointestinal cancer. The primary outcomes were the time to first postoperative flatus and the time to first postoperative bowel movement (BM).

resultsWe found nine relevant RCTs. The mean differences between the daikenchuto group and control group (daikenchuto was not administered) were - 0.43 (95% CI: - 0.77 to - 0.09) days for the time to first postoperative flatus, - 0.29 (95% CI: - 0.59 to 0.01) days for the time to first postoperative BM, and - 0.95 (95% CI: - 1.70 to - 0.21) days for the length of postoperative hospital stay, and the risk ratio of the incidence of intestinal obstruction was 0.60 (95% CI: 0.35-1.03). The time to first postoperative flatus and the length of postoperative hospital stay were significantly shorter in the daikenchuto group than those in the control group (P = 0.01). However, only double-blind studies were evaluated; the results turned to be non-significant.

conclusionAs a result of meta-analysis by all retrieved according to the registered protocol, daikenchuto was efficacious in improving postoperative bowel dysfunction in patients with gastrointestinal cancers. However, limiting to articles with description of COI and blindness, significance disappeared.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MotilityGastrointestinal NeoplasmsHumansIntestinal DiseasesLength of StayMedicine, KampoPanaxPlant ExtractsPostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative PeriodRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeZanthoxylumZingiberaceaedai-kenchu-toPlant ExtractsDaikenchutoGastrointestinal cancersKampoMeta-analysisPostoperative intestinal dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID31297704
OpenAlexW2957098818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.