ArticleMycopathologia2019
In Vitro Activity of Antifungal Drugs Against Trichophyton rubrum and Trichophyton mentagrophytes spp. by E-Test Method and Non-supplemented Mueller-Hinton Agar Plates.
Article in Mycopathologia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of graphene oxide nanosheets and polymethyl methacrylate on nano/hybrid-based restoration dental filler composites: ultrasound behavior and antibacterial activity.Journal of ultrasound · 2025Article
- Integrating sequencing methods with machine learning for antimicrobial susceptibility testing in pediatric infections: current advances and future insights.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Methods for screening and evaluation of antimicrobial activity: A review of protocols, advantages, and limitations.European journal of microbiology & immunology · 2024Review
- Development of an agar-based screening method for terbinafine, itraconazole, and amorolfine susceptibility testing ofJournal of clinical microbiology · 2024Article
- Molecular Verification of Trichophyton in the Brazilian URM Culture Collection.Mycopathologia · 2024Article
- Lactobacillus plantarum strain HT-W104-B1: potential bacterium isolated from Malaysian fermented foods for control of the dermatophyte Trichophyton rubrum.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2021Article
- A Clinical-Mycological Study of Dermatophytosis in Western India with Focus on Antifungal Drug Resistance as a Factor in Recalcitrance.Indian journal of dermatologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Trichophyton rubrum and Trichophyton mentagrophytes spp. are two of the most frequently isolated dermatophytes causing dermatophytosis worldwide. Since the incidence of resistance to antifungal agents is increasing, antifungal susceptibility tests are needed to successfully treat dermatophytoses. Most of the methods currently available are complicated, time-consuming and lack of reference procedures. The aim of this work was to establish a simple protocol to test the susceptibility of dermatophytes isolated from clinical samples against five antifungal drugs using E-test and disk diffusion methods. We used the E-test on non-supplemented Mueller-Hinton agar plates to determine the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole and amphotericin B, and disk diffusion method to determine the interpretive MIC of terbinafine. Fifty dermatophytes-10 T. rubrum and 40 T. mentagrophytes spp.-were assessed after only 96 h of colony growth. Terbinafine was the most active antifungal agent with an inhibition diameter greater than 70 mm (sensitivity > 20 mm), followed by voriconazole, itraconazole and amphotericin B with MICs ranging from 0.032 to 0.38 µg/mL, from 0.006 to 0.125 µg/mL and from 0.5 to 1.5 µg/mL, respectively. All isolates were resistant to fluconazole. Collectively, the less laborious E-test and disk diffusion method were shown to be suitable and reliable to determine antifungal sensitivity of dermatophytes. This simple standard protocol could be employed in the routine of clinical laboratories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.