Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31297654›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2020

Supporting the Return to Work After Cancer in Romania: Exploring Employers' Perspectives.

Adela Elena Popa, Felicia Morândău, Radu-Ioan Popa, Mihai Stelian Rusu, Alexandra Sidor

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The experiences and perceptions of employers on cancer survivors returning to work: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adela Elena PopaFaculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 10 Victoriei Blvd, 550024, Sibiu, Romania. adela.popa@ulbsibiu.ro.ORCID 0000-0002-8917-3148
Felicia MorândăuFaculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 10 Victoriei Blvd, 550024, Sibiu, Romania.
Radu-Ioan PopaFaculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 10 Victoriei Blvd, 550024, Sibiu, Romania.
Mihai Stelian RusuFaculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 10 Victoriei Blvd, 550024, Sibiu, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-5474-3895
Alexandra SidorFaculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 10 Victoriei Blvd, 550024, Sibiu, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose Evidence shows that employers play a key role in facilitating the return to work of employees with cancer, yet little is known about the employers' experiences in settings where no policies or regulations are available to guide this process. Against this background, we aimed (1) to understand how employers experience and manage the process of having employees with cancer and (2) to explore their reflections regarding their role in returning to work. Methods Twenty employers from various types of organisations and sectors were interviewed. Inductive thematic analysis was performed using NVivo 11. Results Employers experienced having employees with cancer as a process with three distinct phases reflected in three emerging themes: disclosure of the diagnosis and absence from work; returning to work; post-returning to work. A fourth theme emphasizes the employers' reflections on how they conceive their own role. In the absence of a normative framework for dealing with employees with cancer, employers used commonsensical rules of thumb and immediate solutions based on ad-hoc decisions and were often compelled to innovate. They offered accommodations only if requested by the employee after returning to work. The return to work process was neither planned nor phased. Conclusion Employers need information and guidelines for effectively assisting employees with cancer. Better channels of communication and collaboration with health professionals are essential for more adequate support for the long-term consequences of cancer. A detailed return to work policy is required to tackle the inconsistencies in the support offered and this policy must also rethink how diagnosis disclosure takes place in Romanian organisations.

Indexed as

AdultCommunicationEmploymentFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsQualitative ResearchReturn to WorkRomaniaWorkplaceCancerEmployerQualitative researchReturn to work

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.