Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31297652›Full record

Trial reportJournal of bone and mineral metabolism2020

Comparison of once-weekly teriparatide and alendronate against new osteoporotic vertebral fractures at week 12.

Satoshi Ikeda, Eiichiro Nakamura, Kenichiro Narusawa, Fumio Fukuda, Hidehiro Matsumoto, Kenichiro Nakai, Takeshi Sakata, Toru Yoshioka, Yoshihisa Fujino, Akinori Sakai and 1 more

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of bone and mineral metabolism, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Conservative treatments for non-surgically managed osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a network meta-analysis of long-term pain and quality of life.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Satoshi IkedaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ken-Ai Memorial Hospital, Onga, Japan. s-ikeda@med.uoeh-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9202-3290
Eiichiro NakamuraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Kenichiro NarusawaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nakashibetsu Town Hospital, Nakashibetsu, Japan.
Fumio FukudaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kitakyushu General Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Hidehiro MatsumotoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sanzai Hospital, Miyazaki, Japan.
Kenichiro NakaiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Moriguchi Ikuno Memorial Hospital, Moriguchi, Japan.
Takeshi SakataDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kitade Hospital, Gobo, Japan.
Toru YoshiokaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shimura Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Yoshihisa FujinoDepartment of Environmental Epidemiology, Institute of Industrial Ecological Sciences, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyusyu, Japan.
Akinori SakaiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan.
KOTU T-WRAP Study Investigators
University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan · JPUniversity of Miyazaki Hospital · JPKawamura Hospital · JPNoguchi Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of the present multicenter randomized study was to compare weekly teriparatide with alendronate in their inhibition of vertebral collapse, effects on delayed union, pain relief, and improvement of quality of life (QOL) in women with new osteoporotic vertebral fractures within 1 week after onset of the fracture. Patients were randomly allocated to the teriparatide and alendronate groups. Vertebral collapse, low back pain assessed by a visual analog scale, and QOL assessed by EuroQol 5 dimension at weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 after the start of the treatment were compared between the groups. Lumbar bone mineral density (BMD) at baseline and week 12 and the rate of delayed union at week 12 were also compared. Each group consisted of 48 subjects. Vertebral collapse progressed over time in both groups, with no significant difference between the groups. Pain on rising up from lying position, turning over in bed, and resting in the lying position improved over time in both groups, with no significant difference between the groups. There were no significant differences in increase in BMD and delayed union. QOL in the teriparatide group showed significant improvement in comparison with that in the alendronate group at week 12. The weekly formulation of teriparatide showed comparable inhibition of vertebral collapse, increase in BMD, promotion of bone union, and improvement of pain and significant improvement of QOL at week 12 in comparison with alendronate in patients with a new osteoporotic vertebral fracture within 1 week after onset of the fracture. The weekly formulation of teriparatide may have improved components of QOL other than pain at week 12.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAlendronateBone DensityBone Density Conservation AgentsDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansQuality of LifeSpinal FracturesTeriparatideVisual Analog ScaleAlendronateBone Density Conservation AgentsTeriparatideDelayed unionEuroQol 5 dimensionKyphosis angleVisual analog scaleWedge angle

Identifiers

PMID31297652
OpenAlexW2957282171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.