Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31297568›Full record

ArticleCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2020

Acute hydroxyurea-induced replication blockade results in replisome components disengagement from nascent DNA without causing fork collapse.

Amaia Ercilla, Sonia Feu, Sergi Aranda, Alba Llopis, Sólveig Hlín Brynjólfsdóttir, Claus Storgaard Sørensen, Luis Ignacio Toledo, Neus Agell

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Features and mechanisms of long-livedZoological research · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Safeguarding DNA Replication: A Golden Touch of MiDAS and Other Mechanisms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Amaia ErcillaDepartament de Biomedicina, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8999-7131
Sonia FeuDepartament de Biomedicina, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Sergi ArandaCentre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
Alba LlopisDepartament de Biomedicina, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Sólveig Hlín BrynjólfsdóttirBiotech Research and Innovation Centre (BRIC), University of Copenhagen, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Claus Storgaard SørensenBiotech Research and Innovation Centre (BRIC), University of Copenhagen, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Luis Ignacio ToledoCentre for Chromosome Stability (CCS), University of Copenhagen, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Neus AgellDepartament de Biomedicina, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, 08036, Barcelona, Spain. neusagell@ub.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1205-6074
University of Copenhagen · DKConsorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer · ESCentre for Genomic Regulation · ES

Funding

Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad SAF2013-42742-RMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad SAF2016-76239-R
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During S phase, replication forks can encounter several obstacles that lead to fork stalling, which if persistent might result in fork collapse. To avoid this collapse and to preserve the competence to restart, cells have developed mechanisms that maintain fork stability upon replication stress. In this study, we aimed to understand the mechanisms involved in fork stability maintenance in non-transformed human cells by performing an isolation of proteins on nascent DNA-mass spectrometry analysis in hTERT-RPE cells under different replication stress conditions. Our results show that acute hydroxyurea-induced replication blockade causes the accumulation of large amounts of single-stranded DNA at the fork. Remarkably, this results in the disengagement of replisome components from nascent DNA without compromising fork restart. Notably, Cdc45-MCM-GINS helicase maintains its integrity and replisome components remain associated with chromatin upon acute hydroxyurea treatment, whereas replisome stability is lost upon a sustained replication stress that compromises the competence to restart.

Indexed as

Cell LineDNA ReplicationDNA, Single-StrandedHumansHydroxyureaS PhaseDNA, Single-StrandedHydroxyureaCMGiPONDReplication fork stabilityReplication stress

Identifiers

PMID31297568
PMCPMC11104804
OpenAlexW2961820214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.