Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31297530›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2019

De Novo Mutation Rate Estimation in Wolves of Known Pedigree.

Evan M Koch, Rena M Schweizer, Teia M Schweizer, Daniel R Stahler, Douglas W Smith, Robert K Wayne, John Novembre

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Fine-scale recombination rates inferred using the canFam4 assembly are strongly correlated with previous maps of dog recombination.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Evan M KochDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.ORCID 0000-0002-1124-4559
Rena M SchweizerDivision of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT.
Teia M SchweizerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
Daniel R StahlerYellowstone Center for Resources, National Park Service, Yellowstone National Park, WY.
Douglas W SmithYellowstone Center for Resources, National Park Service, Yellowstone National Park, WY.
Robert K WayneDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
John NovembreDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
National Park Service · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Montana · US

Funding

PREDOCTORAL TRAINING IN GENETICS AND REGULATIONT32GM007197 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI ROTHMAN-DENES, LUCIA B. B · 1985 to 2020
$17.0M
Population Genetic Consequences of Recent Explosive Population Growth in HumansR01GM108805 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI CLARK, ANDREW G, KEINAN, ALON · 2014 to 2017
$2.2M
Genome Sequencer FLXS10RR029668 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI NGAI, JOHN J. · 2010 to 2010
$623k
Illumina Sequencer to Facilitate Functional Genomics at BerkeleyS10RR027303 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI TAYLOR, JOHN W. · 2010 to 2010
$500k
NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR027303NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR029668NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108805NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007197
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge of mutation rates is crucial for calibrating population genetics models of demographic history in units of years. However, mutation rates remain challenging to estimate because of the need to identify extremely rare events. We estimated the nuclear mutation rate in wolves by identifying de novo mutations in a pedigree of seven wolves. Putative de novo mutations were discovered by whole-genome sequencing and were verified by Sanger sequencing of parents and offspring. Using stringent filters and an estimate of the false negative rate in the remaining observable genome, we obtain an estimate of ∼4.5 × 10-9 per base pair per generation and provide conservative bounds between 2.6 × 10-9 and 7.1 × 10-9. Although our estimate is consistent with recent mutation rate estimates from ancient DNA (4.0 × 10-9 and 3.0-4.5 × 10-9), it suggests a wider possible range. We also examined the consequences of our rate and the accompanying interval for dating several critical events in canid demographic history. For example, applying our full range of rates to coalescent models of dog and wolf demographic history implies a wide set of possible divergence times between the ancestral populations of dogs and extant Eurasian wolves (16,000-64,000 years ago) although our point estimate indicates a date between 25,000 and 33,000 years ago. Aside from one study in mice, ours provides the only direct mammalian mutation rate outside of primates and is likely to be vital to future investigations of mutation rate evolution.

Indexed as

demographic historydog domesticationmutation rate

Identifiers

PMID31297530
PMCPMC6805234
OpenAlexW2956311538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.