ArticleNanoImpact2019
Environmental fate of multiwalled carbon nanotubes and graphene oxide across different aquatic ecosystems.
Article in NanoImpact, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.
- Carbon Nanomaterial Fluorescent Probes and Their Biological Applications.Chemical reviews · 2024Review
- Removal of carboxylated multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT-COOH) from the environment by Trametes versicolor: a simple, cost-effective, and eco-friendly method.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Toxicity and Biotransformation of Carbon-Based Nanomaterials in Marine MicroalgaeInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Nanomaterials: a review of emerging contaminants with potential health or environmental impact.Discover nano · 2023Review
- Evaluation of pancreatic δ- cells as a potential target site of graphene oxide toxicity in Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes) fish.Ecotoxicology and environmental safety · 2023Article
- Toward waterborne protozoa detection using sensing technologies.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Review
- Colloidal Behavior and Biodegradation of Engineered Carbon-Based Nanomaterials in Aquatic Environment.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Exposure of Midge Larvae (Toxics · 2022Article
- Histopathological evaluation of the interrenal gland (adrenal homolog) of Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes) exposed to graphene oxide.Environmental toxicology · 2022Article
- Simulation of the Environmental Fate and Transformation of Nano Copper Oxide in a Freshwater Environment.ACS ES&T water · 2022Article
- Toxicity of Carbon-Based Nanomaterials in the Human Lung: A Comparative In-Vitro Study.Tanaffos · 2022Article
- Mutual impacts and interactions of antibiotic resistance genes, microcystin synthetase genes, graphene oxide, and Microcystis aeruginosa in synthetic wastewater.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
- Histological and Histochemical Evaluation of the Effects of Graphene Oxide on Thyroid Follicles and Gas Gland of Japanese Medaka (Oryzias latipes) Larvae.Chemosphere · 2022Article
- Carbon Nanotubes, Graphene, and Carbon Dots as Electrochemical Biosensing Composites.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Sex-reversal and Histopathological Assessment of Potential Endocrine-Disrupting Effects of Graphene Oxide on Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes) Larvae.Chemosphere · 2021Article
- Graphene-Based Nanomaterials Modulate Internal Biofilm Interactions and Microbial Diversity.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Environmental effects of stratospheric ozone depletion, UV radiation and interactions with climate change: UNEP Environmental Effects Assessment Panel, update 2019.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2020Review
- Fragmentation of polymer nanocomposites: modulation by dry and wet weathering, fractionation, and nanomaterial filler.Environmental science. Nano · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The industrial use and widespread application of carbon-based nanomaterials have caused a rapid increase in their production over the last decades. However, toxicity of these materials is not fully known and is still being investigated for potential human and ecological health risks. Detecting carbon-based nanomaterials in the environment using current analytical methods is problematic, making environmental fate and transport modeling a practical way to estimate environmental concentrations and assess potential ecological risks. The Water Quality Analysis Simulation Program 8 (WASP8) is a dynamic, spatially resolved fate and transport model for simulating exposure concentrations in surface waters and sediments. Recently, WASP has been updated to incorporate processes for simulating the fate and transport of nanomaterials including heteroaggregation and phototransformation. This study examines the fate and transport of multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT), graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) in four aquatic ecosystems in the southeastern United States. Sites include a seepage lake, a coastal plains river, a piedmont river and an unstratified, wetland lake. A hypothetical 50-year release is simulated for each site-nanomaterial pair to analyze nanomaterial distribution between the water column and sediments. For all nanomaterials, 99% of the mass loaded moves though systems of high and low residence times without being heteroaggregated and deposited in the sediments. However, significant accumulation in the sediments does occur over longer periods of time. Results show that GO and rGO had the highest mass fraction in the water column of all four sites. MWCNT were found predominantly in the sediments of the piedmont river and seepage lake but were almost entirely contained in the water column of the coastal plains river and wetland lake. Simulated recovery periods following the release estimate 37+ years for lakes and 1-4 years for rivers to reduce sediment nanomaterial concentrations by 50% suggesting that carbon-based nanomaterials have the potential for long-term ecological effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.