ReviewAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)2019
Tackling gaps in developing life-changing treatments for dementia.
Review in Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the neurotrophic peptide mixture in pathogenetic therapy of patients with Parkinson's disease.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2026Article
- Mechanisms and Characteristics of Chronic Pain in Alzheimer's Disease: A Narrative Review.Current medicinal chemistry · 2026Review
- A Systematic Online Living Evidence Summary of experimental Alzheimer's disease research.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2024Article
- Considerations for Use of Blood-Based Biomarkers in Epidemiologic Dementia Research.American journal of epidemiology · 2024Article
- Design of a Non-Interventional Study to Assess Neurologists' Perspectives and Pharmacological Treatment Decisions in Early Alzheimer's Disease.Neurology and therapy · 2023Article
- Immunomodulation in age-related disorders and nanotechnology interventions.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2023Review
- An Optimized Comparative Proteomic Approach as a Tool in Neurodegenerative Disease Research.Cells · 2022Review
- National Institute on Aging seed funding enables Alzheimer's disease startups to reach key value inflection points.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2022Review
- Exploiting Focused Ultrasound to Aid Intranasal Drug Delivery for Brain Therapy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Delivering Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (CST) Virtually: Developing and Field-Testing a New Framework.Clinical interventions in aging · 2022Article
- Article
- Comparative profiling of the synaptic proteome from Alzheimer's disease patients with focus on the APOE genotype.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Since the G8 dementia summit in 2013, a number of initiatives have been established with the aim of facilitating the discovery of a disease-modifying treatment for dementia by 2025. This report is a summary of the findings and recommendations of a meeting titled "Tackling gaps in developing life-changing treatments for dementia", hosted by Alzheimer's Research UK in May 2018. The aim of the meeting was to identify, review, and highlight the areas in dementia research that are not currently being addressed by existing initiatives. It reflects the views of leading experts in the field of neurodegeneration research challenged with developing a strategic action plan to address these gaps and make recommendations on how to achieve the G8 dementia summit goals. The plan calls for significant advances in (1) translating newly identified genetic risk factors into a better understanding of the impacted biological processes; (2) enhanced understanding of selective neuronal resilience to inform novel drug targets; (3) facilitating robust and reproducible drug-target validation; (4) appropriate and evidence-based selection of appropriate subjects for proof-of-concept clinical trials; (5) improving approaches to assess drug-target engagement in humans; and (6) innovative approaches in conducting clinical trials if we are able to detect disease 10-15 years earlier than we currently do today.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.