Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31297347›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical treatment and research2019

Repeat hepatectomy for recurred colorectal liver metastasis: is it justified?

Jangho Park, Seung-Duk Lee, Sung-Sik Han, Seoung Hoon Kim, Sang-Jae Park, Jae Hwan Oh, Jungnam Joo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical treatment and research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. HEPATECTOMIES: INDICATIONS AND RESULTS FROM A REFERENCE HOSPITAL IN THE BRAZILIAN AMAZON.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. RE-HEPATECTOMY MEANS MORE MORBIDITY? A MULTICENTRIC ANALYSIS.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jangho ParkCenter for Liver Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Seung-Duk LeeCenter for Liver Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Sung-Sik HanCenter for Liver Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7047-7961
Seoung Hoon KimCenter for Liver Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Sang-Jae ParkCenter for Liver Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Jae Hwan OhCenter for Colorectal Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Jungnam JooBiometrics Research Branch, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLiver resection is considered the only curative treatment modality for colorectal liver metastasis. The recurrence rate after hepatectomy is >50%. Two or more hepatectomies are applied to treat recurred metastases. We assessed the efficiency and feasibility of repeat hepatectomy and analyzed the prognostic factors after a repeat hepatectomy.

methodsIn total, 248 patients were diagnosed with recurred liver metastasis between January 2003 and May 2016. Second and third hepatectomies were performed in 70 and 7 patients, respectively. The other 171 patients did not undergo a repeat hepatectomy. Clinical features were collected from the medical records. We analyzed survival rates of the repeat hepatectomy group and the nonrepeat hepatectomy group. We also investigated factors affecting overall and disease-free survival of patients who received a repeat hepatectomy using univariate and multivariate analyses.

resultsMedian overall survival was significantly higher in the repeat hepatectomy group than in the nonrepeat group (83.0 months vs. 25.0 months, P < 0.001). The morbidity and mortality rates of repeat hepatectomy were 9.1% and 0%, respectively. Median overall and disease-free survival of the repeat hepatectomy group were 62.0 and 51.0 months, respectively. The number of recurred tumors was the only significant factor for disease-free survival (P = 0.029). None of the factors affected overall survival.

conclusionRepeat hepatectomy is necessary, effective, and safe for treating recurred colorectal liver metastasis. Repeat hepatectomy can be considered in patients with fewer than three recurred metastatic tumors.

Indexed as

Colorectal neoplasmsFeasibility studiesHepatectomyPrognosisRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID31297347
PMCPMC6609413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.