Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31297287›Full record

ArticleSafety and health at work2019

Insights Into Emissions and Exposures From Use of Industrial-Scale Additive Manufacturing Machines.

A B Stefaniak, A R Johnson, S du Preez, D R Hammond, J R Wells, J E Ham, R F LeBouf, S B Martin, M G Duling, L N Bowers and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Safety and health at work, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Identification of effective control technologies for additive manufacturing.Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Characterization of Ultrafine Particles and VOCs Emitted from a 3D Printer.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  13. Reducing ultrafine particulate emission from multiple 3D printers in an office environment using a prototype engineering control.Journal of nanoparticle research : an interdisciplinary forum for nanoscale science and technology · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Nano- and microplastics in the workplace.Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

A B StefaniakNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV, 26505, USA.
A R JohnsonNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV, 26505, USA.
S du PreezNorth-West University, Occupational Hygiene and Health Research Initiative, Private Bag X6001, Potchefstroom, 2520, South Africa.
D R HammondNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH, 45213, USA.
J R WellsNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV, 26505, USA.
J E HamNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV, 26505, USA.
R F LeBoufNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV, 26505, USA.
S B MartinNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV, 26505, USA.
M G DulingNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV, 26505, USA.
L N BowersNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV, 26505, USA.
A K KneppNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV, 26505, USA.
D J de BeerNorth-West University, Technology and Innovation Support Office, Private Bag X6001, Potchefstroom, 2520, South Africa.
J L du PlessisNorth-West University, Occupational Hygiene and Health Research Initiative, Private Bag X6001, Potchefstroom, 2520, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmerging reports suggest the potential for adverse health effects from exposure to emissions from some additive manufacturing (AM) processes. There is a paucity of real-world data on emissions from AM machines in industrial workplaces and personal exposures among AM operators.

methodsAirborne particle and organic chemical emissions and personal exposures were characterized using real-time and time-integrated sampling techniques in four manufacturing facilities using industrial-scale material extrusion and material jetting AM processes.

resultsUsing a condensation nuclei counter, number-based particle emission rates (ERs) (number/min) from material extrusion AM machines ranged from 4.1 × 10

conclusionIndustrial-scale AM machines using thermoplastics and resins released particles and organic vapors into workplace air. More research is needed to understand factors influencing real-world industrial-scale AM process emissions and exposures.

Indexed as

Additive manufacturingMaterial extrusionMaterial jettingUltrafine particlesVolatile organic compounds

Identifiers

PMID31297287
PMCPMC6598813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.