Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31297250›Full record

ReviewBMJ global health2019

Measuring the coverage of nutrition interventions along the continuum of care: time to act at scale.

Stuart Gillespie, Purnima Menon, Rebecca Heidkamp, Ellen Piwoz, Rahul Rawat, Melinda Munos, Robert Black, Chika Hayashi, Kuntal Kumar Saha, Jennifer Requejo

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ global health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Policies and programmes to improve preconception nutrition in South Asia.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Then and Now: Investigating Anthropometrics and Child Mortality among Females in Malawi.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Stuart GillespiePoverty, Health and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8501-5943
Purnima MenonPoverty, Health and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Rebecca HeidkampInternational Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Ellen PiwozGlobal Development Program, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Rahul RawatGlobal Development Program, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Melinda MunosInternational Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Robert BlackInternational Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Chika HayashiMonitoring and Statistics, Unicef USA, New York, New York, USA.
Kuntal Kumar SahaNutrition for Health and Development, Organisation mondiale de la Sante, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jennifer RequejoInternational Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USGates Foundation · USInternational Food Policy Research Institute · USUnited Nations Children's Fund · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global community is committed to addressing malnutrition. And yet, coverage data for high-impact interventions along the continuum of care remain scarce due to several measurement and data collection challenges. In this analysis paper, we identify 24 nutrition interventions that should be tracked by all countries, and determine if their coverage is currently measured by major household nutrition and health surveys. We then present three case studies, using published literature and empirical data from large-scale initiatives, to illustrate the kind of data collection innovations that are feasible. We find that data are not routinely collected in a standardised way across countries for most of the core set of interventions. Case studies-of growth monitoring and screening for acute malnutrition, infant and young child feeding counselling, and nutrition monitoring in India-highlight both challenges and potential solutions. Advancing the nutrition intervention coverage measurement agenda is essential for sustained progress in driving down rates of malnutrition. It will require (1) global consensus on a core set of validated coverage indicators on proven, high-impact nutrition-specific interventions; (2) the inclusion of coverage measurement and indicator guidance in WHO intervention recommendations; (3) the incorporation of these indicators into data collection mechanisms and relevant intervention delivery platforms; and (4) an agenda for continuous measurement improvement.

Indexed as

Child healthhealth systemsmaternal healthnutritionprevention strategies

Identifiers

PMID31297250
PMCPMC6590959
OpenAlexW2955094087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.