Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31297236›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2019

Return to Everyday Activity in the Community and Home: a feasibility study for a lifestyle intervention to sit less, move more, and be strong.

Maureen C Ashe, Nicola Y Edwards, Amanda Taylor, Laura Burnett, Lora Giangregorio, Kate Milne, Lindy Clemson, Lena Fleig

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02786394 (REACH Lifestyle Program for Older Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02786394 nacompletednot on this map

REACH Lifestyle Program for Older Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of British ColumbiaRan2016 to 2016Enrolled11ConditionsAging, Activity, LifestyleArmsREACH
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Implementation and evaluation of an integrated ayurveda-yoga education program for lifestyle modifications among people with cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Maureen C Ashe *1Department of Family Practice, Centre for Hip Health and Mobility, 7F-2635 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9 Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6820-4435
Nicola Y Edwards *1Department of Family Practice, Centre for Hip Health and Mobility, 7F-2635 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9 Canada.
Amanda Taylor3The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Laura Burnett1Department of Family Practice, Centre for Hip Health and Mobility, 7F-2635 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9 Canada.
Lora Giangregorio4University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Kate MilneCardea Health Consulting, Vancouver, Canada.
Lindy Clemson6University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Lena Fleig7MSB Medical School Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Vancouver Coastal Health · CAMSB Medical School Berlin · DEThe University of Adelaide · AUThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Waterloo · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany interventions designed to meet physical activity guideline recommendations focus on a single component (e.g., walking), to the detriment of other elements of a healthy lifestyle, such as reducing prolonged sitting and doing balance and strength exercises (i.e., bundled multiple behaviors). Adopting these multiple health behaviors within daily life routines may facilitate uptake and support longer-term behavior change. We tested feasibility for a three-part lifestyle intervention to support older women to sit less, move more, and complete balance and strength exercises.

methodsWe used a convergent parallel mixed-methods, single-arm study design to test feasibility for a 6-week lifestyle intervention: Return to Everyday Activities in the Community and Home (REACH). We collected information at baseline, 3 and 6 weeks (final), and 6 months (follow-up) using questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, and performance-based measures. We describe three key elements: (1) implementation factors such as recruitment, retention, program delivery, and adherence; (2) participants' acceptability and experience with the program; and (3) health outcomes, including participants' global mobility, activity, and perceptions of their physical activity identity, and habit strength for (i) physical activity, (ii) breaking up sitting time, and (iii) balance and strength exercises.

resultsWe were able to recruit enough participants in the allotted time to conduct one cycle of the REACH group-based program. There were 10 community-dwelling women, median (p25, p75) age 61 (57.5, 71) years, who completed the study. The program was feasible to deliver, with high attendance (mean 5/6 sessions) and positive overall ratings (8/10). Participants rated session content and length high, and educational materials as highly acceptable and understandable. Although participants were active walkers at baseline, few were breaking up prolonged sitting or participating in any balance and strength exercises. At final and follow-up assessments, participants reported developing habits for all three health behaviors, without diminishing physical activity.

conclusionThese results show acceptability of the program and its materials, and feasibility for bundling multiple health behaviors within the REACH program. It also provides confirmation to advance to testing feasibility of this three-part lifestyle intervention with older, less active, adults.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier, NCT02786394; May 18, 2016.

Indexed as

Balance and strengthDual-process theory of behavior changeHabit strengthPhysical activity identity

Identifiers

PMID31297236
PMCPMC6599351
OpenAlexW2955778132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.