Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31297223›Full record

ArticleBMJ open diabetes research & care2019

Perceived diabetes risk and related determinants in individuals with high actual diabetes risk: results from a nationwide population-based survey.

Christin Heidemann, Rebecca Paprott, Lena M Stühmann, Jens Baumert, Kristin Mühlenbruch, Sylvia Hansen, Catarina Schiborn, Daniela Zahn, Paul Gellert, Christa Scheidt-Nave

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Understanding barriers and facilitators of adherence to lifestyle changes in prediabetes: a qualitative study.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2026
    Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Tight and early HbAFrontiers in public health · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Christin HeidemannDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9413-2148
Rebecca PaprottDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Lena M StühmannDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Jens BaumertDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Kristin MühlenbruchDepartment of Molecular Epidemiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Nuthetal, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6188-2017
Sylvia HansenOffice for National Education and Communication on Diabetes mellitus, Federal Centre for Health Education, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2304-9248
Catarina SchibornDepartment of Molecular Epidemiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Nuthetal, Germany.
Daniela ZahnOffice for National Education and Communication on Diabetes mellitus, Federal Centre for Health Education, Cologne, Germany.
Paul GellertInstitute of Medical Sociology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
Christa Scheidt-NaveDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Robert Koch Institute · DEFederal Centre for Health Education · DEGerman Institute of Human Nutrition · DEInstitute of Sociology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was first, to examine perceived diabetes risk compared with actual diabetes risk in the general population and second, to investigate which factors determine whether persons at increased actual risk also perceive themselves at elevated risk. Research design and methods: The study comprised adults (aged 18-97 years) without known diabetes from a nationwide survey on diabetes-related knowledge and information needs in Germany in 2017. Actual diabetes risk was calculated by an established risk score estimating the 5-year probability of developing type 2 diabetes and was compared with perceived risk of getting diabetes over the next 5 years (response options: 'almost no risk', 'slight risk', 'moderate risk', 'high risk'; n = 2327). Among adults with an increased actual diabetes risk (n=639), determinants of perceived risk were investigated using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results: Across groups with a 'low' (<2%), 'still low' (2% to<5%), 'elevated' (5% to <10%), and 'high' (≥10%) actual diabetes risk, a proportion of 89.0%, 84.5%, 79.3%, and 78.9%, respectively, perceived their diabetes risk as almost absent or slight. Among those with an increased (elevated/high) actual risk, independent determinants of an increased (moderate/high) perceived risk included younger age (OR 0.92 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.96) per year), family history of diabetes (2.10 (1.06-4.16)), and being informed about an increased diabetes risk by a physician (3.27 (1.51-7.07)), but none of further diabetes risk factors, healthcare behaviors or beliefs about diabetes. Conclusions: Across categories of actual diabetes risk, perceived diabetes risk was low, even if actual diabetes risk was high. For effective strategies of primary diabetes prevention, attention should be directed to risk communication at the population level as well as in primary care practice.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth Risk BehaviorsPerceptionAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDiabetes MellitusFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk Assessmentadult diabetesawarenessdeterminantsrisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID31297223
PMCPMC6590966
OpenAlexW2949814664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.