ArticleJournal of environmental health science & engineering2019
Chemical composition of PM
Article in Journal of environmental health science & engineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hemolytic Properties of Fine Particulate Matter (PMToxics · 2024Article
- Dust Storms Increase the Risk of Age-Related Macular Degeneration.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Dust storm index anomaly for sand-dust events monitoring in western Iran and its association with the NDVI and LST anomalies.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
- Effect of titanium dioxide nanoparticles on DNA methylation of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells.Toxicology research · 2021Article
- Airborne particulate matter in Tehran's ambient air.Journal of environmental health science & engineering · 2021Review
- An unorthodox pathophysiology of severe cases of COVID-19 the weak heme hypothesis.American journal of blood research · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to investigate chemical composition of PM
methodsPM
resultsDaily average of PM
conclusionsAs the results, chemical composition of sampled particles from inversion days and dust storm was different from each other. Hemolytic effects of particles during dust storm were more than inversion days. However, this difference was not statistically significant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.