Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31297187›Full record

ReviewF1000Research2019

Recent advances in celiac disease and refractory celiac disease.

Georgia Malamut, Sascha Cording, Nadine Cerf-Bensussan

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in F1000Research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Liver Involvement in Celiac Disease and Immune-Mediated Diseases of the Small Bowel.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Celiac Crisis: A Life-Threatening Complication of Celiac Disease.Middle East journal of digestive diseases · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Extranodal T- and NK-cell lymphomas.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Georgia MalamutGastroenterology, Hôpital Cochin APHP, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4030-3025
Sascha CordingUniversité Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
Nadine Cerf-BensussanUniversité Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
Délégation Paris 5 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Celiac disease (CeD), defined as gluten-induced enteropathy, is a frequent and largely underdiagnosed disease. Diagnosis relies on the detection of highly specific serum IgA anti-transglutaminase auto-antibodies and on the demonstration of duodenal villous atrophy. Treatment necessitates a strict gluten-free diet, which resolves symptoms and enables histological recovery. However, regular follow-up is necessary to assess mucosal healing, which emerges as an important prognostic factor. Recent work on CeD pathogenesis has highlighted how the cross-talk between gluten-specific CD4

Indexed as

Celiac DiseaseDiet, Gluten-FreeDisease ProgressionGlutensHumansTransglutaminasesGlutensTransglutaminasesceliac diseaserefractory celiac disease

Identifiers

PMID31297187
PMCPMC6600866
OpenAlexW2953943462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.