Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31296967›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology2019

First translational consensus on terminology and definitions of colonic motility in animals and humans studied by manometric and other techniques.

Maura Corsetti, Marcello Costa, Gabrio Bassotti, Adil E Bharucha, Osvaldo Borrelli, Phil Dinning, Carlo Di Lorenzo, Jan D Huizinga, Marcel Jimenez, Satish Rao and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
13.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 143 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Unique properties of proximal and distal colon reflect distinct motor functions.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Effect of propinox and pinaverium bromide onFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. CaPhysiological reviews · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 13 institutions in 9 countries.

Maura Corsetti *NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Marcello Costa *Human Physiology and Centre of Neuroscience, College of Medicine, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.
Gabrio BassottiDepartment of Medicine, University of Perugia Medical School, Perugia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0237-1812
Adil E BharuchaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Osvaldo BorrelliDepartment of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Sick Children, London, UK.
Phil DinningHuman Physiology and Centre of Neuroscience, College of Medicine, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.
Carlo Di LorenzoDepartment of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Jan D HuizingaDepartment of Medicine, Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Marcel JimenezDepartment of Cell Physiology, Physiology and Immunology and Neuroscience Institute, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Satish RaoDivision of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.
Robin SpillerNIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6371-4500
Nick J SpencerDiscipline of Human Physiology, School of Medicine, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.
Roger LentleDigestive Biomechanics Group, College of Health, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Jasper PannemansDepartment of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Alexander ThysDepartment of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Marc BenningaTranslational Research Center for Gastrointestinal disorders (TARGID), Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Jan TackDepartment of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands. jan.tack@med.kuleuven.be.
Flinders University · AUEmma Kinderziekenhuis · NLNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLAugusta University · USGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GBKU Leuven · BEMassey University · NZMayo Clinic in Arizona · USNationwide Children's Hospital · USPopulation Health Research Institute · CAUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversity of Perugia · IT

Funding

Pathophysiology of Anorectal DisordersR01DK078924 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI BHARUCHA, ADIL E. · 2008 to 2023
$5.0M
Comparative Effectiveness of Biofeedback, Sacral Nerve Stimulation, and Injectable Bulking Agents for Treatment of Fecal IncontinenceU34DK109191 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BHARUCHA, ADIL E., GANTZ, MARIE G · 2016 to 2017
$711k
NEUROMODULATION THERAPY FOR FECAL INCONTINENCER21DK104127 · NIDDK · AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY · PI RAO, SATISH SC · 2015 to 2016
$395k
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK078924NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK104127NIDDK NIH HHS U34 DK109191
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alterations in colonic motility are implicated in the pathophysiology of bowel disorders, but high-resolution manometry of human colonic motor function has revealed that our knowledge of normal motor patterns is limited. Furthermore, various terminologies and definitions have been used to describe colonic motor patterns in children, adults and animals. An example is the distinction between the high-amplitude propagating contractions in humans and giant contractions in animals. Harmonized terminology and definitions are required that are applicable to the study of colonic motility performed by basic scientists and clinicians, as well as adult and paediatric gastroenterologists. As clinical studies increasingly require adequate animal models to develop and test new therapies, there is a need for rational use of terminology to describe those motor patterns that are equivalent between animals and humans. This Consensus Statement provides the first harmonized interpretation of commonly used terminology to describe colonic motor function and delineates possible similarities between motor patterns observed in animal models and humans in vitro (ex vivo) and in vivo. The consolidated terminology can be an impetus for new research that will considerably improve our understanding of colonic motor function and will facilitate the development and testing of new therapies for colonic motility disorders.

Indexed as

AnimalsColonColonic DiseasesConsensusGastrointestinal MotilityHumansManometry

Identifiers

PMID31296967
PMCPMC7136172
OpenAlexW2960060080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.