Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31296867›Full record

ArticleNPJ primary care respiratory medicine2019

Real-life prescribing of asthmatic treatments in UK general practice over time using 2014 BTS/SIGN steps.

Alicia Gayle, Abigail Tebboth, Marie Pang, Florent Guelfucci, Ramzi Argoubi, Steven Sherman, Vincent Mak

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ primary care respiratory medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Medication Adherence in Children with Asthma.Patient preference and adherence · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Alicia GayleBoehringer Ingelheim, Bracknell, UK. alicia.gayle@boehringer-ingelheim.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6129-6250
Abigail TebbothBoehringer Ingelheim, Bracknell, UK.
Marie PangBoehringer Ingelheim, Bracknell, UK.
Florent GuelfucciCreativ-Ceutical, Paris, France.
Ramzi ArgoubiCreativ-Ceutical, Paris, France.
Steven ShermanCreativ-Ceutical, Chicago, IL, USA.
Vincent MakImperial College Healthcare Trust, London, UK.
Boehringer Ingelheim (United Kingdom) · GBCreativ-Ceutical (France) · FRImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 2014 British Thoracic Society (BTS) and Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network (SIGN) guidelines recommend a stepwise approach to asthma management. We investigated the management of asthma in primary care in the UK to understand how real-world practice compares with BTS/SIGN guidelines. Asthma patients were identified from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink from September 2006 to August 2016. Aims were to classify patients according to BTS/SIGN steps, describe the proportion of patients transitioning between steps and describe patient demographics and clinical characteristics per group. Overall, 647,308 patients with asthma were identified (40,096 aged 5-11 years; 607,212 aged 12-80 years). Most treated patients were in step 1 or 2 (88.3% of children/67.5% of adults in December 2007; 83.0% of children/67.0% of adults in June 2016). Most patients remained within their treatment step within a 6-month interval (>78% of children and adults throughout the study duration). The proportion of patients stepping up and down reduced from the beginning of the study, although stepping down to step 1 was relatively common in both adults and children. Few patients had a recorded asthma review in the year before reference date (18.8% of children and 14.8% of adults). Although prescribing patterns meant that most patients remained within their treatment step throughout the study, we cannot be sure that this was because their disease was truly stable. The small proportion of patients stepping up/down and the lack of recorded asthma review suggest that patients may not be treated in accordance with BTS/SIGN guidelines.

Indexed as

General PracticePractice Patterns, Physicians'AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaChildChild, PreschoolDrug PrescriptionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited KingdomAnti-Asthmatic Agents

Identifiers

PMID31296867
PMCPMC6624291
OpenAlexW2956206272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.