Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31296512›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2019

Nosocomial infection prevalence in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO): protocol for a point prevalence study across Australia and New Zealand.

Amanda Corley, India Lye, Jayshree D Lavana, Abhilasha Ahuja, Chris M Anstey, Paul Jarrett, Emma Haisz, Rachael Parke, Vincent Pellegrino, Hergen Buscher and 2 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Risk factors for venoarterial-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation related nosocomial infection in children after cardiac surgery.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Amanda CorleyCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital and University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
India LyeCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital and University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Jayshree D LavanaAdult Intensive Care Services, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Abhilasha AhujaAdult Intensive Care Services, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Chris M AnsteyIntensive Care Unit, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Birtinya, Queensland, Australia.
Paul JarrettCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital and University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Emma HaiszPaediatric Intensive Care Unit, Queensland Children's Hospital, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Rachael ParkeCardiothoracic and Vascular Intensive Care Unit, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Vincent PellegrinoDepartment of Intensive Care, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Hergen BuscherDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
John F FraserCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital and University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
ECMO PP Study Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionExtracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) provides cardiac and/or respiratory support when other therapies fail. Nosocomial infection is reported in up to 64% of patients receiving ECMO and increases morbidity and mortality. These patients are at high risk of infection due, in part, to the multiple invasive devices required in their management, the largest being the cannulae through which ECMO is delivered. Prevalence of nosocomial infection in ECMO patients, including ECMO cannula-related infection, is not well described across Australia and New Zealand. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective, observational point prevalence study of 12 months duration conducted at 11 ECMO centres across Australia and New Zealand. Data will be collected for every patient receiving ECMO during 12 predetermined data collection weeks. The primary outcome is the prevalence of laboratory-confirmed bloodstream infection, and suspected or probable nosocomial infections; and the secondary outcomes include describing ECMO cannula dressing and securement practices, and adherence to local dressing and securement guidelines. Data collection will be finalised by March 2019. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Relevant ethical and governance approvals have been received. Study results will describe the prevalence of suspected and confirmed nosocomial infection in adult, paediatric and neonatal patients receiving ECMO across Australia and New Zealand. It is expected that the results will be hypothesis generating and lead to interventional trials aimed at reducing the high infection rates seen in this cohort. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ANZCTRN12618001109291; Pre-results.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAustraliaChildChild, PreschoolCross InfectionCross-Sectional StudiesExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationFemaleHumansIncidenceInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle Agedinfection control

Identifiers

PMID31296512
PMCPMC6624104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.