Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31296350›Full record

ReviewAtencion primaria2019

[Validity and limitations of methods to measure the intake and elimination of salt].

Amelia Jiménez Rodríguez, Luis Palomo Cobos, José Pedro Novalbos Ruiz, Amelia Rodríguez Martín

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Atencion primaria, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amelia Jiménez RodríguezMédico de Atención Primaria, Servicio Extremeño de Salud, Cáceres, España.
Luis Palomo CobosMédico de Atención Primaria, Servicio Extremeño de Salud, Cáceres, España. Electronic address: luispalomocobos@gmail.com.
José Pedro Novalbos RuizMedicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, Universidad de Cádiz, Cádiz, España.
Amelia Rodríguez MartínMedicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, Universidad de Cádiz, Cádiz, España.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High blood pressure (HBP) is the main modifiable cardiovascular risk factor. HBP can be related to high salt intake. To measure intake, not all feeding surveys are comparable and valid. The reference procedure for assessing salt intake consists of measuring the urinary excretion of sodium in urine collected during 24hours, although alternative methods have been proposed, such as the collection of punctual and timed urine samples. In this review, we analyze which instruments allow the assessment of salt intake and which of them have provided greater validity and reliability through studies of concordance with the elimination of sodium in urine. Current food consumption surveys are inadequate because of their wide variability and relatively low correlation with the elimination of sodium in 24-hour urine. Its main limitation is the need for validation in different population groups. In primary care, salt intake should be assessed by using frequency-of-consumption questionnaires that collect foods with a high salt content, the consumption of preprepared dishes and questions that quantify the addition of salt in the preparation of food or at the table. For the validation of these questionnaires, the standard gold elimination of 24-hour urine sodium adjusted according to creatinine clearance should be used.

Indexed as

Diet RecordsAdolescentAdultChildCreatinineFeeding BehaviorHumansHypertensionReproducibility of ResultsSodiumSodium Chloride, DietaryTime FactorsCreatinineSodiumSodium Chloride, DietaryEncuestas alimentaciónFood surveysHigh blood pressureHipertensión arterialIngesta de salNatriuresisSalt intake

Identifiers

PMID31296350
PMCPMC6930942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.