Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31296263›Full record

ArticleMilitary Medical Research2019

Toward more reliable stability measurements in stance: recommendations for number of measurements, foot position and feedback -- a cross-sectional study among servicemen.

Saskia Maria Theresia van der Heijden, Maarten Reinders Prins, Peter van der Wurff

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Military Medical Research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Saskia Maria Theresia van der HeijdenPhysical Therapy Sciences, Program in Clinical Health Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Maarten Reinders PrinsResearch and Development, Military Rehabilitation Center Aardenburg, Korte Molenweg 3, 3941PW, Doorn, The Netherlands.
Peter van der WurffResearch and Development, Military Rehabilitation Center Aardenburg, Korte Molenweg 3, 3941PW, Doorn, The Netherlands. P.van.der.Wurff@mrcdoorn.nl.
University of Applied Sciences Utrecht · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the military, insufficient postural stability is a risk factor for developing lower extremity injuries. Postural stability training programs are effective in preventing these injuries. However, an objective method for the measurement of postural stability in servicemen is lacking. The primary objective of this study was to assess the influence of the number of repetitions, different foot positions and real-time visual feedback on postural stability, as well as their effects on the intrasession reliability of postural stability measurements in servicemen. The secondary objective was to assess the concurrent validity of the measurements.

methodsTwenty healthy servicemen between 20 and 50 years of age and in active duty were eligible for this quantitative, cross-sectional study. The measurements took place on a force plate, measuring the mean velocity of the center of pressure. The participants were asked to stand as still as possible in three different foot positions (wide stance, small stance, and on one leg), five times each for 45 s each time, and the measurements were performed with and without real-time visual feedback.

resultsWe observed a significant main effect of foot position (P < 0.001), but not of visual feedback (P = 0.119) or repetition number (P = 0.915). Postural stability decreased in the more challenging foot positions. The ICC estimates varied from 0.809 (one repetition in wide stance) to 0.985 (five repetitions on one leg). The common variance (R

conclusionsTo yield reliable data, wide-stance measurements should be conducted three times, and small-stance measurements and measurements on one leg should be conducted two times. The scores of a measurement in a particular foot position cannot predict the scores of measurements in other foot positions.

Indexed as

Postural BalancePostureAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFeedback, SensoryFootHumansLegMaleMilitary PersonnelReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultCenter of PressureConcurrent validityIntrasession reliabilityPostural stabilityServicemen

Identifiers

PMID31296263
PMCPMC6624869
OpenAlexW2959220033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.