Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31296235›Full record

ArticleHuman resources for health2019

Gender equity in planning, development and management of human resources for health: a scoping review.

Nour El Arnaout, Rana F Chehab, Bayan Rafii, Mohamad Alameddine

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Human resources for health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Gender balance in Australian pharmacy organisations: Are we there yet?Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Gender Equity in Academic Medicine.Journal of Korean medical science · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Gender Bias and the Lack of Equity in Pandemic Nursing in China: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nour El ArnaoutGlobal Health Institute, American University of Beirut, Riad El Solh, Beirut, 1107 2020, Lebanon.
Rana F ChehabDepartment of Nutrition Science, College of Health and Human Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Bayan RafiiDepartment of Health Management and Policy, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Riad El Solh, Beirut, 1107 2020, Lebanon.
Mohamad AlameddineDepartment of Health Management and Policy, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Riad El Solh, Beirut, 1107 2020, Lebanon. ma164@aub.edu.lb.ORCID 0000-0002-2299-1242

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGender equity remains a challenge across various labor markets with the health market being no exception. Despite the increased influx of women into health professions, horizontal and vertical occupational gender inequities persist. MAIN BODY: The objective of this scoping review is to map the studies on gender equity in healthcare systems in terms of workforce planning, development, and management, as well as to identify the barriers and facilitators for integrating gender equity into healthcare systems. We reviewed the literature on the topic using nine electronic and two grey literature databases with the search strategy combining medical subheadings and keywords for each of the following four concepts of interest: "gender equity," "human resources for health," "healthcare setting," and "management processes." The scoping review included studies focusing on the examination of gender equity at the level of the health workforce. Out of 20,242 studies identified through the database search, the full text of 367 articles was assessed for eligibility and 110 were included in the qualitative analysis. The data of those studies was abstracted and analyzed into themes. Results do not only reveal a global dearth of studies focused on this important topic, but also the concentration of such studies in a few countries around the globe, mainly in North America and Europe. Four out of each five studies included in this review focused on physicians, followed by nurses (14%). In terms of design, an overwhelming majority of studies utilized quantitative designs (75%), followed by qualitative designs and database analyses. Studies were categorized into four pre-determined main themes: facilitators and barriers, workforce planning, HRH management, and HRH development.

conclusionFuture research is needed to better understand poorly covered sub-themes such as mentorship, professional development, and training, as well as recruitment and retention among others. It is also equally needed to fill in the gaps in professional groups, study type, methodology, and region. While the review unearthed a number of well-studied themes, significant aspects of the topic remain untapped especially in developing countries and at the level of health professionals other than physicians.

Indexed as

Health WorkforcePersonnel ManagementSexismSocial JusticeFemaleHumansMalePersonnel SelectionPlanning TechniquesDevelopmentEquityGenderHealthHuman ResourcesManagementPlanning

Identifiers

PMID31296235
PMCPMC6625080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.