ArticleHuman resources for health2019
Gender equity in planning, development and management of human resources for health: a scoping review.
Article in Human resources for health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Measuring the composition and availability of human resources for health by sex in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2023, and workforce gaps for universal health coverage: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023.The Lancet. Public health · 2026Article
- Career choice processes in occupational therapy, speech and language therapy, and physiotherapy: a scoping review.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Influence of marital pressures and cultural constructs on females (IMPACT-F): a global study of female medical students and doctors.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- 'Breakdown and healing' - adaptation experiences of postpartum nurses returning to work: a descriptive phenomenological study.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- Gender balance in Australian pharmacy organisations: Are we there yet?Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2024Article
- Spiritual needs during COVID 19 pandemic in the perceptions of Spanish emergency critical care health professionals.Intensive & critical care nursing · 2023Article
- Gender Equity in Academic Medicine.Journal of Korean medical science · 2023Article
- Rehabilitation workforce descriptors: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Development assistance for human resources for health, 1990-2020.Human resources for health · 2022Article
- Work stress in nurses returning to tertiary a general hospitals in China after the delivery of their second child: a cross-sectional study.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Social Media as a Tool to Advance Women in Cardiology: Paving the Way for Gender Equality and Diversity.CJC open · 2021Review
- Gender Bias and the Lack of Equity in Pandemic Nursing in China: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Regional Disparities of Rehabilitation Resources for Persons with Disabilities in China: Data from 2014 to 2019.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- The Use of Social Media by Female Physicians in an International Setting: A Mixed Methods Study of a Group WhatsApp Chat.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGender equity remains a challenge across various labor markets with the health market being no exception. Despite the increased influx of women into health professions, horizontal and vertical occupational gender inequities persist. MAIN BODY: The objective of this scoping review is to map the studies on gender equity in healthcare systems in terms of workforce planning, development, and management, as well as to identify the barriers and facilitators for integrating gender equity into healthcare systems. We reviewed the literature on the topic using nine electronic and two grey literature databases with the search strategy combining medical subheadings and keywords for each of the following four concepts of interest: "gender equity," "human resources for health," "healthcare setting," and "management processes." The scoping review included studies focusing on the examination of gender equity at the level of the health workforce. Out of 20,242 studies identified through the database search, the full text of 367 articles was assessed for eligibility and 110 were included in the qualitative analysis. The data of those studies was abstracted and analyzed into themes. Results do not only reveal a global dearth of studies focused on this important topic, but also the concentration of such studies in a few countries around the globe, mainly in North America and Europe. Four out of each five studies included in this review focused on physicians, followed by nurses (14%). In terms of design, an overwhelming majority of studies utilized quantitative designs (75%), followed by qualitative designs and database analyses. Studies were categorized into four pre-determined main themes: facilitators and barriers, workforce planning, HRH management, and HRH development.
conclusionFuture research is needed to better understand poorly covered sub-themes such as mentorship, professional development, and training, as well as recruitment and retention among others. It is also equally needed to fill in the gaps in professional groups, study type, methodology, and region. While the review unearthed a number of well-studied themes, significant aspects of the topic remain untapped especially in developing countries and at the level of health professionals other than physicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.