ArticleRetrovirology2019
On the generation of the MSD-Ѱ class of defective HIV proviruses.
Article in Retrovirology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of a highly sensitive and specific intact proviral DNA assay for HIV-1 subtype B and C.Virology journal · 2024Article
- Learning from Persistent Viremia: Mechanisms and Implications for Clinical Care and HIV-1 Cure.Current HIV/AIDS reports · 2023Review
- Clonally expanded HIV-1 proviruses with 5'-leader defects can give rise to nonsuppressible residual viremia.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2023Article
- Phenotypic characterization of single CD4+ T cells harboring genetically intact and inducible HIV genomes.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Article
- HIVIntact: a python-based tool for HIV-1 genome intactness inference.Retrovirology · 2021Article
- In-depth single-cell analysis of translation-competent HIV-1 reservoirs identifies cellular sources of plasma viremia.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Increased Proviral DNA in Circulating Cells Correlates with Plasma Viral Rebound in Simian Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Rhesus Macaques after Antiretroviral Therapy Interruption.Journal of virology · 2021Article
- The Quest for Cellular Markers of HIV Reservoirs: Any Color You Like.Frontiers in immunology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Antiretroviral therapy (ART) can effectively suppress ongoing HIV replication and block disease progression, but the infection is never cured due to the persistence of a small pool of latently infected cells hosting integrated replication-competent HIV proviruses. However, the vast majority of HIV proviruses in ART-treated patients are replication-incompetent due to a variety of genetic defects. Most defective proviruses (around 90%) contain large internal deletions or are G-to-A hypermutated, resulting in destruction of most if not all viral open reading frames, which is consistent with the idea that cytotoxic T cells (CTLs) effectively remove cells that produce viral antigens. An intriguing subclass of defective proviruses (around 10%) that are consistently detected in such patients carry a small deletion or a point mutation in a relatively precise and well conserved region near the 5' end of the HIV genome, in the area that encodes the major splice donor (MSD) site and the packaging signal Ѱ in the viral RNA genome. Why this subclass of proviruses is defective has never been properly understood. We now propose a mechanistic scenario for how these MSD-Ѱ mutations can prevent viral protein expression. Based on ample results in literature, we argue that MSD inactivation triggers the activity of the 5'-polyadenylation site, resulting in the production of ultra-short non-protein-coding HIV transcripts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.