ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2019
Developing a patient portal for haematology patients requires involvement of all stakeholders and a customised design, tailored to the individual needs.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of Digital Care Platforms on Quality of Care for Oncological Patients and Barriers and Facilitators for Their Implementation: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Pooled it
- Functionalities and Issues in the Implementation of Personal Health Records: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Pooled it
- Health Care Professionals' Experiences of Patient-Professional Communication Over Patient Portals: Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Pooled it
- Design and evaluation patient portal for patients with HTLV-1.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Digital Health Portals for Individuals Living With or Beyond Cancer: Patient-Driven Scoping Review.JMIR cancer · 2025Article
- Identification and Classification Features of Patient Portal, A Systematic Review.Health science reports · 2025Review
- Designing an interoperable patient portal to augment an Advanced Nurse Practitioner service for Children with hydrocephalus.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2024Article
- Rationale and development of an e-health application to deliver patient-centered care during treatment for recently diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: pilot study of the MM E-coach.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2023Article
- Accessing Patient Electronic Health Record Portals Safely Using Social Credentials: Demonstration Pilot Study.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
- Participants' views and experiences from setting up a shared patient portal for primary and specialist health services- a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Caregivers' role in using a personal electronic health record: a qualitative study of cancer patients and caregivers in Germany.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundElectronic patient portals are increasingly being implemented, also in (haemato) oncology. However, portal usage is low and depends on user and provider engagement. We explored wishes, expectations and thoughts of patients with a haematologic malignancy and their physicians with regard to the electronic patient portal.
methodsBased on insights from literature and a focus group discussion we built a 44-item questionnaire. This questionnaire was spread amongst patients with a haematologic malignancy at the outpatient clinic that was not yet exposed to patient portal facilities. Haematologists completed a questionnaire based on literature.
resultsPatients were interested in many different types of access to information and portal functionalities. However, their opinions varied about the provision of access to the portal to other people, the role of the physician, possibilities for communication via the portal and timing of access. The physicians acknowledged the relevance of the electronic patient portal, but had some worries about the patients' autonomous information handling, organizational and technical issues. Patients frequently expressed to be open about the potential of the patient portal to orchestrate their care. Nevertheless, most physicians appreciated their supporting role towards the patient.
conclusionsPatients and physicians appreciated the electronic patient portal. Both groups need to be involved in further portal development to improve engagement by meeting patients' wishes, taking into account organizational and professional issues and managing expectations for both parties. To fit various patient profiles, portal design should be flexible and individualized. Further research should focus on the perceived added value and the impact on patient related outcome measures of portals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.