Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31295733›Full record

ArticleBiomedical materials (Bristol, England)2020

Quantitative evaluation of the in vivo biocompatibility and performance of freeze-cast tissue scaffolds.

Prajan Divakar, Karen L Moodie, Eugene Demidenko, P Jack Hoopes, Ulrike G K Wegst

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical materials (Bristol, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Prajan DivakarThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4680-9521
Karen L MoodieGeisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, United States of America.
Eugene DemidenkoThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, United States of America.
P Jack HoopesThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, United States of America.
Ulrike G K WegstThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9057-415X
Dartmouth College · US

Funding

Training in Surgical InnovationT32EB021966 · NIBIB · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Eric R Fossum, Sohail K Mirza · 2017 to 2026
$1.7M
A Nanotherapeutic Device for Effective Non-Surgical Female SterilizationR21HD087828 · NICHD · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI WEGST, ULRIKE GESA KATHARINA · 2016 to 2017
$435k
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB021966NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD087828
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative methods are little used for the in vivo assessment of tissue scaffolds to evaluate biocompatibility. To complement current histological techniques, we introduce as a measure of biocompatibility a straightforward, geometric analysis for the quantitative assessment of encapsulation thickness, cross-sectional area, and biomaterial shape. Advantages of this new technique are that it enables, on the one hand, a more complete and objective comparison of scaffolds with differing compositions, architectures, and mechanical properties, and, on the other, a more objective approach to their selection for a given application. In this contribution, we focus on freeze-cast polymeric scaffolds for tissue regeneration and their subcutaneous implantation in mice for biocompatibility testing. Initially, seven different scaffold types are screened. Of these, three are selected for systematic biocompatibility studies based on histopathological criteria: EDC-NHS-crosslinked bovine collagen, EDC-NHS-crosslinked bovine collagen-nanocellulose, and chitin. Geometric models developed to quantify scaffold size, ovalization, and encapsulation thickness are tested, evaluated, and found to be a powerful and objective metric for the in vivo assessment of biocompatibility and performance of tissue scaffolds.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsCelluloseTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsBiopolymersCattleChitinCollagenForeign-Body ReactionFreeze DryingFreezingImmune SystemMaterials TestingMiceMice, Inbred C3HModels, TheoreticalBiocompatible MaterialsBiopolymersCelluloseChitinCollagenPolymers

Identifiers

PMID31295733
PMCPMC6954349
OpenAlexW2960136944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.