Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31295730›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2019

Radio-enhancement by gold nanoparticles and their impact on water radiolysis for x-ray, proton and carbon-ion beams.

Benedikt Rudek, Aimee McNamara, Jose Ramos-Méndez, Hilary Byrne, Zdenka Kuncic, Jan Schuemann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Benedikt RudekDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, MA, United States of America.
Aimee McNamaraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, MA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8792-0464
Jose Ramos-MéndezDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8106-5142
Hilary ByrneSchool of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7023-7976
Zdenka KuncicSchool of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6765-3215
Jan SchuemannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, MA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7554-8818

Funding

TOPAS - nBio, a Monte Carlo tool for radiation biology researchR01CA187003 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI SCHUEMANN, JAN PATRICK OSCAR · 2015 to 2024
$4.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA187003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gold nanoparticle (GNP) radio-enhancement is a promising technique to increase the dose deposition in a tumor while sparing neighboring healthy tissue. Previous experimental studies showed effects on cell survival and tumor control for keV x-rays but surprisingly also for MV-photons, proton and carbon-ion beams. In a systematic study, we use the Monte Carlo simulation tool TOPAS-nBio to model the GNP radio-enhancement within a cell as a function of GNP concentration, size and clustering for a wide range of energies for photons, protons and, for the first time, carbon-ions. Moreover, we include water radiolysis, which has been recognized as a major pathway of GNP mediated radio-enhancement. At a GNP concentration of 0.5% and a GNP diameter of 10 nm, the dose enhancement ratio was highest for 50 keV x-rays (1.36) and decreased in the orthovoltage (1.04 at 250 keV) and megavoltage range (1.01 at 1 MeV). The dose enhancement linearly increased with GNP concentration and decreased with GNP size and degree of clustering for all radiation modalities. While the highest physical dose enhancement at 5% concentrations was only 1.003 for 10 MeV protons and 1.004 for 100 MeV carbon-ions, we find the number of hydroxyl ([Formula: see text]) altered by 23% and 3% after 1 [Formula: see text]s at low, clinically-relevant concentrations. For the same concentration and proton-impact, the G-value is most sensitive to the nanoparticle size with 46 times more radical interactions at GNPs for 2 nm than for 50 nm GNP diameter within 1 [Formula: see text]s. Nanoparticle clustering was found to decrease the number of interactions at GNPs, e.g. for a cluster of 25 GNPs by a factor of 3.4. The changes in G-value correlate to the average distance between the chemical species and the GNPs. While the radiochemistry of GNP-loaded water has yet to be fully understood, this work offers a first relative quantification of radiolysis products for a broad parameter-set.

Indexed as

Carbon RadioisotopesGoldHeavy Ion RadiotherapyMetal NanoparticlesMonte Carlo MethodProtonsRadiation-Sensitizing AgentsWaterX-RaysCarbon RadioisotopesGoldProtonsRadiation-Sensitizing AgentsWater

Identifiers

PMID31295730
PMCPMC11222020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.