ArticleWorld neurosurgery2019
Tentorial Venous Anatomy: Cadaveric and Radiographic Study with Discussion of Origin and Surgical Significance.
Article in World neurosurgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- The cuneus vein: initial anatomical description and preservation technique for posterior interhemispheric approaches.Acta neurochirurgica · 2026Article
- Combined cone-beam CT imaging and microsurgical dissection of cadaver specimens to study cerebral venous anatomy: a technical note.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2023Article
- Tentorial venous anatomy of mice and humans.JCI insight · 2021Article
- Bridging veins of the cerebellum: a magnetic resonance imaging study.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2021Article
- Tentorial Venous Anatomy: Variation in the Healthy Population.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2020Article
- Related Structures in the Straight Sinus: An Endoscopic Anatomy and Histological Study.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDescribed variations of tentorial venous anatomy impact surgical sectioning of the tentorium in skull base approaches; however, described configurations do not consistently explain postoperative complications. To understand the outcomes of 2 clinical cases we studied the tentorial venous anatomy of 2 cadavers.
methodsThe venous anatomy of the tentorium isolated in 2 uninjected fresh cadaver head specimens with preserved bridging veins was observed by transillumination before and after methylene blue injection of the dural sinuses and tentorial veins. Our findings in cadavers were applied to explain the clinical and radiologic (magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomographic venography) findings in the 2 cases presented.
resultsA consistent transtentorial venous system, arising from transverse and straight sinuses, communicating with supra- and infratentorial bridging veins was seen in the cadaver and patient radiography (magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomographic venography). Our first patient had a cerebellar venous infarct from compromise of the venous drainage from the adjacent brain after ligation of a temporal lobe bridging vein to the tentorium. Our second patient suffered no clinical effects from bilateral transverse sinus occlusion due to drainage through the accessory venous system within the tentorium.
conclusionsHerein, we elaborate on transtentorial venous anatomy. These veins, previously reported to obliterate in completed development of the tentorium, remain patent with consistent observed configuration. The same transtentorial venous system was observed in both cases and provided insight to their outcomes. These findings emphasize the importance of the transtentorial venous system physiologically and in surgical approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.