Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31295294›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Twitter-based measures of neighborhood sentiment as predictors of residential population health.

Joseph Gibbons, Robert Malouf, Brian Spitzberg, Lourdes Martinez, Bruce Appleyard, Caroline Thompson, Atsushi Nara, Ming-Hsiang Tsou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Estimating geographic subjective well-being from Twitter: A comparison of dictionary and data-driven language methods.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Joseph GibbonsDepartment of Sociology, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2470-9068
Robert MaloufDepartment of Linguistics and Asian/Middle Eastern Languages, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Brian SpitzbergSchool of Communication, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3838-6052
Lourdes MartinezSchool of Communication, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Bruce AppleyardSchool of Public Affairs and Fine Arts, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Caroline ThompsonSchool of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Atsushi NaraDepartment of Geography, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Ming-Hsiang TsouDepartment of Geography, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, United States of America.

Funding

The Research Infrastructure Core of SDSU HealthLINK Center for Transdisciplinary Health Disparities ResearchU54MD012397 · NIMHD · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GUADALUPE X AYALA · 2018 to 2026
$39.0M
Building Capacity and Infrastructure for Population Health and Health Disparities Research at San Diego State UniversityS21MD010690 · NIMHD · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI AYALA, GUADALUPE X, CASTILLO, JOSE E · 2016 to 2020
$10.0M
NIMHD NIH HHS S21 MD010690NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD012397
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several studies have recently applied sentiment-based lexicons to Twitter to gauge local sentiment to understand health behaviors and outcomes for local areas. While this research has demonstrated the vast potential of this approach, lingering questions remain regarding the validity of Twitter mining and surveillance in local health research. First, how well does this approach predict health outcomes at very local scales, such as neighborhoods? Second, how robust are the findings garnered from sentiment signals when accounting for spatial effects? To evaluate these questions, we link 2,076,025 tweets from 66,219 distinct users in the city of San Diego over the period of 2014-12-06 to 2017-05-24 to the 500 Cities Project data and 2010-2014 American Community Survey data. We determine how well sentiment predicts self-rated mental health, sleep quality, and heart disease at a census tract level, controlling for neighborhood characteristics and spatial autocorrelation. We find that sentiment is related to some outcomes on its own, but these relationships are not present when controlling for other neighborhood factors. Evaluating our encoding strategy more closely, we discuss the limitations of existing measures of neighborhood sentiment, calling for more attention to how race/ethnicity and socio-economic status play into inferences drawn from such measures.

Indexed as

Mental HealthPopulation HealthSocial MediaCardiovascular DiseasesCensusesCitiesEthnicityHappinessHumansPublic OpinionSemanticsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID31295294
PMCPMC6622529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.