Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31295269›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Detection of Mycoplasma anatis, M. anseris, M. cloacale and Mycoplasma sp. 1220 in waterfowl using species-specific PCR assays.

Dénes Grózner, Kinga Mária Sulyok, Zsuzsa Kreizinger, Zsuzsanna Rónai, Szilárd Jánosi, Ibolya Turcsányi, Henrik Fülöp Károlyi, Áron Botond Kovács, Márton József Kiss, Dmitriy Volokhov and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Microorganisms · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Detection of Mycoplasma spp. in free-living seabirds.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Dénes GróznerInstitute for Veterinary Medical Research, Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.
Kinga Mária SulyokInstitute for Veterinary Medical Research, Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.
Zsuzsa KreizingerInstitute for Veterinary Medical Research, Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.
Zsuzsanna RónaiVeterinary Diagnostic Directorate, National Food Chain Safety Office, Budapest, Hungary.
Szilárd JánosiVeterinary Diagnostic Directorate, National Food Chain Safety Office, Budapest, Hungary.
Ibolya TurcsányiVeterinary Diagnostic Directorate, National Food Chain Safety Office, Budapest, Hungary.
Henrik Fülöp KárolyiInstitute for Veterinary Medical Research, Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.
Áron Botond KovácsInstitute for Veterinary Medical Research, Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.
Márton József KissTOLL 96 Kft., Hajdúsámson, Hungary.
Dmitriy VolokhovCenter for Biologics Evaluation and Research, U. S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.
Miklós GyuraneczInstitute for Veterinary Medical Research, Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-5698-5713

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mycoplasma anatis, M. anseris, M. cloacale and M. sp. 1220 colonise geese and ducks, and could be associated with infections of avian respiratory and nervous systems, cause mild to severe inflammation of cloaca and genital tracts, and embryo lethality. Co-occurrence of these Mycoplasma species in waterfowl is frequently detected and the identification of these mycoplasmas to the species level at a regular microbiology laboratory is difficult due to their similar morphological, cultural and biochemical properties. Moreover, species differentiation is only possible based on the sequence analysis of the product of a genus-specific PCR assay. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to develop an effective and robust method for the identification of these species in avian clinical specimens. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays using species-specific primers, which target housekeeping genes in order to identify these species, were designed in the present study. The developed PCR assays can precisely identify these four mycoplasmas to the species level directly from DNA samples extracted from clinical specimens, and no cross-amplification was observed among these species and with other well-known avian mycoplasmas. The average sensitivity of the assays was 101-102 genomic equivalents per reaction. These conventional PCR assays can be run simultaneously at the same PCR cycling program, and the species can be differentiated directly (without sequence analysis) by gel electrophoresis due to the specific sizes of the amplicons. In conclusion, the presented species-specific assays were found to be suitable for routine use at regular veterinary diagnostic laboratories and promote the rapid, simple and cost-effective differentiation of these waterfowl Mycoplasma species.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, WildBird DiseasesBirdsChickensDNA, BacterialDNA PrimersDucksGeeseGenes, BacterialMycoplasmaMycoplasma InfectionsPolymerase Chain ReactionSpecies SpecificityTurkeysDNA, BacterialDNA Primers

Identifiers

PMID31295269
PMCPMC6622482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.