Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31295267›Full record

ReviewPLoS computational biology2019

Machine and deep learning meet genome-scale metabolic modeling.

Guido Zampieri, Supreeta Vijayakumar, Elisabeth Yaneske, Claudio Angione

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS computational biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 138 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
138citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

138 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Predicting Strain-Specific Metabolic Capabilities in the GenusComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026
    Article
  9. The renaissance ofFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

78 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Guido ZampieriDepartment of Computer Science and Information Systems, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4518-5913
Supreeta VijayakumarDepartment of Computer Science and Information Systems, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6357-0439
Elisabeth YaneskeDepartment of Computer Science and Information Systems, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom.
Claudio AngioneDepartment of Computer Science and Information Systems, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3140-7909

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L013754/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Omic data analysis is steadily growing as a driver of basic and applied molecular biology research. Core to the interpretation of complex and heterogeneous biological phenotypes are computational approaches in the fields of statistics and machine learning. In parallel, constraint-based metabolic modeling has established itself as the main tool to investigate large-scale relationships between genotype, phenotype, and environment. The development and application of these methodological frameworks have occurred independently for the most part, whereas the potential of their integration for biological, biomedical, and biotechnological research is less known. Here, we describe how machine learning and constraint-based modeling can be combined, reviewing recent works at the intersection of both domains and discussing the mathematical and practical aspects involved. We overlap systematic classifications from both frameworks, making them accessible to nonexperts. Finally, we delineate potential future scenarios, propose new joint theoretical frameworks, and suggest concrete points of investigation for this joint subfield. A multiview approach merging experimental and knowledge-driven omic data through machine learning methods can incorporate key mechanistic information in an otherwise biologically-agnostic learning process.

Indexed as

Deep LearningGenomeMachine LearningMetabolic Networks and PathwaysComputational BiologyGenotypePhenotype

Identifiers

PMID31295267
PMCPMC6622478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.