ArticleSexually transmitted diseases2019
Changes in Patient Visits After the Implementation of Insurance Billing at a Sexually Transmitted Diseases Clinic in a Medicaid Expansion State.
Article in Sexually transmitted diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Implementing Insurance Billing in Local Health Department Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinics in Virginia, 2017.Sexually transmitted diseases · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMedicaid expansion has led to unique opportunities for sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics to improve the sustainability of services by billing insurance. We evaluated changes in patient visits after the implementation of insurance billing at a STD clinic in a Medicaid expansion state.
methodsThe Rhode Island STD Clinic offered HIV/STD screening services at no cost to patients until October 2016, when insurance billing was implemented. Care for uninsured patients was still provided for free. We compared the clinic visits in the preinsurance period with the postinsurance period using t-tests, Poisson regressions, and a logistic regression.
resultsA total of 5560 patients were seen during the preinsurance (n = 2555) and postinsurance (n = 3005) periods. Compared with the preinsurance period, the postinsurance period had a significantly higher average number of patient visits/month (212.9 vs. 250.4, P = 0.0016), including among patients who were black (36.8 vs. 50.3, P = 0.0029), Hispanic/Latino (50.8 vs. 65.8, P = 0.0018), and insured (106.3 vs. 130.1, P = 0.0025). The growth rate of uninsured (+0.10 vs. +4.11, P = 0.0026) and new patients (-4.28 vs. +1.07, P = 0.0007) also increased between the two periods. New patients whose first visit was before the billing change had greater odds (adjusted odds ratio, 2.68, 95% confidence interval, 2.09-3.44; P < 0.0001) of returning compared with new patients whose first visit was after the billing change.
conclusionsImplementation of insurance billing at a publicly funded STD clinic, with free services provided to uninsured individuals, was associated with a modest increase in patient visits and a decline in patients returning for second visits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.