Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31295191›Full record

ArticleMedical care2019

Does Early Follow-Up Improve the Outcomes of Sepsis Survivors Discharged to Home Health Care?

Partha Deb, Christopher M Murtaugh, Kathryn H Bowles, Mark E Mikkelsen, Hoda Nouri Khajavi, Stanley Moore, Yolanda Barrón, Penny H Feldman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Partha DebHunter College, City University of New York (CUNY) and National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).
Christopher M MurtaughCenter for Home Care Policy and Research, Visiting Nurse Service of New York, New York, NY.
Kathryn H BowlesCenter for Home Care Policy and Research, Visiting Nurse Service of New York, New York, NY.
Mark E MikkelsenPerelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Hoda Nouri KhajaviHunter College and the Graduate Center, City University of New York (CUNY), New York, NY.
Stanley MooreIndependent Contractor, Bonny Doon, California.
Yolanda BarrónCenter for Home Care Policy and Research, Visiting Nurse Service of New York, New York, NY.
Penny H FeldmanCenter for Home Care Policy and Research, Visiting Nurse Service of New York, New York, NY.
Visiting Nurse Service of New York · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USIndependent Sector · USNational Bureau of Economic Research · USThe Graduate Center, CUNY · US

Funding

Sepsis Survivors' Post-Acute Outcomes: Impact of Early Home Health and MD VisitsR01NR016014 · NINR · VISITING NURSE SERVICE OF NEW YORK · PI BOWLES, KATHRYN HELENE · 2015 to 2025
$4.6M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR016014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is little evidence to guide the care of over a million sepsis survivors following hospital discharge despite high rates of hospital readmission.

objectiveWe examined whether early home health nursing (first visit within 2 days of hospital discharge and at least 1 additional visit in the first posthospital week) and early physician follow-up (an outpatient visit in the first posthospital week) reduce 30-day readmissions among Medicare sepsis survivors.

designA pragmatic, comparative effectiveness analysis of Medicare data from 2013 to 2014 using nonlinear instrumental variable analysis. SUBJECTS: Medicare beneficiaries in the 50 states and District of Columbia discharged alive after a sepsis hospitalization and received home health care. MEASURES: The outcomes, protocol parameters, and control variables were from Medicare administrative and claim files and the home health Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS). The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause hospital readmission.

resultsOur sample consisted of 170,571 mostly non-Hispanic white (82.3%), female (57.5%), older adults (mean age, 76 y) with severe sepsis (86.9%) and a multitude of comorbid conditions and functional limitations. Among them, 44.7% received only the nursing protocol, 11.0% only the medical doctor protocol, 28.1% both protocols, and 16.2% neither. Although neither protocol by itself had a statistically significant effect on readmission, both together reduced the probability of 30-day all-cause readmission by 7 percentage points (P=0.006; 95% confidence interval=2, 12).

conclusionsOur findings suggest that, together, early postdischarge care by home health and medical providers can reduce hospital readmissions for sepsis survivors.

Indexed as

AftercareAgedClinical ProtocolsFemaleHome Health NursingHumansMalePatient DischargeSepsisTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID31295191
PMCPMC11648946
OpenAlexW2960683087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.