Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31295165›Full record

ArticleMedical care2019

Health Care Utilization After Paraprofessional-administered Substance Use Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment: A Multi-level Cost-offset Analysis.

Jason Paltzer, David Paul Moberg, Marguerite Burns, Richard L Brown

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medical care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Payment and Financing for Substance Use Screening and Brief Intervention for Adolescents and Adults in Health, School, and Community Settings.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jason PaltzerPopulation Health Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison, College of Nursing & Health Care Professions, Grand Canyon University.
David Paul MobergPopulation Health Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Marguerite BurnsDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
Richard L BrownConcertoHealth, Kalamazoo, MI.

Funding

SBIRT Outcomes in a Low Income PopulationR03AA025196 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MOBERG, D PAUL · 2017 to 2018
$153k
NIAAA NIH HHS R03 AA025196
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAuthorities recommend universal substance use screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) for all (ie, universal) adult primary care patients.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to examine long-term (24-mo) changes in health care utilization and costs associated with receipt of universal substance use SBIRT implemented by paraprofessionals in primary care settings. RESEARCH

designThis study used a difference-in-differences design and Medicaid administrative data to assess changes in health care use among Medicaid beneficiaries receiving SBIRT. The difference-in-differences estimates were used in a Monte Carlo simulation to estimate potential cost-offsets associated with SBIRT. SUBJECTS: The treatment patients were Medicaid beneficiaries who completed a 4-question substance use screen as part of an SBIRT demonstration program between 2006 and 2011. Comparison Medicaid patients were randomly selected from matched clinics in Wisconsin. MEASURES: The study includes 4 health care utilization measures: outpatient days; inpatient length of stay; inpatient admissions; and emergency department admissions. Each outcome was assigned a unit cost based on mean Wisconsin Medicaid fee-for-service reimbursement amounts.

resultsWe found an annual increase of 1.68 outpatient days (P=0.027) and a nonsignificant annual decrease in inpatient days of 0.67 days (P=0.087) associated with SBIRT. The estimates indicate that the cost of a universal SBIRT program could be offset by reductions in inpatient utilization with an annual net cost savings of $782 per patient.

conclusionsParaprofessional-delivered universal SBIRT is likely to yield health care cost savings and is a cost-effective mechanism for integrating behavioral health services in primary care settings.

Indexed as

AdultCost-Benefit AnalysisCosts and Cost AnalysisFemaleHealth Care CostsHealth Plan ImplementationHumansLinear ModelsMaleMass ScreeningMultilevel AnalysisPatient Acceptance of Health CarePrimary Health CarePsychotherapy, BriefReferral and ConsultationSubstance-Related Disorders

Identifiers

PMID31295165
PMCPMC6690790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.