ArticleMedical care2019
The Changing Distribution of Length of Hospitalization at Academic Medical Centers 2007-2016.
Article in Medical care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Demographic characteristics and associated conditions in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli positive patients.Gut pathogens · 2026Article
- Risk-Adjusted Excess Length of Stay for Patients With Heart Failure Across Facilities: A Large US Cohort Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Analyzing the 20-year declining trend of hospital length-of-stay in European countries with different healthcare systems and reimbursement models.International journal of health economics and management · 2024Article
- The increasing impact of length of stay "outliers" on length of stay at an urban academic hospital.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Hospital Length of Stay … A Measure of What, Exactly?Medical care · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLength of stay (LOS) remains a primary focus for hospitals, and patients with prolonged LOS disproportionately affect hospital capacity and costs. We recently showed that long LOS patients are increasingly hospitalized at academic centers, but their effect on the distribution of LOS is unknown.
methodsUsing the Vizient Clinical Data Base/Resource Manager (CDB/RM), which includes over 90% of the academic medical centers in the United States, we examined trends in the distributions of LOS for acute medical/surgical hospitalizations from 2007 to 2016 in 117 hospitals. We excluded patients under 18 years and those with primary psychiatry, obstetric or rehabilitation diagnoses.
resultsTwo separate trends were evident during this time period. Mean LOS decreased steadily from 2007 to 2010, but then rose steadily from 2011 and reached its maximum in 2016. Median LOS remained consistent at 3 days from 2007 to 2013 but it too rose from 2014 to 2016. As expected from the difference between the mean and median values, LOS at the 99th percentile dropped from 2007 to 2010 but then rose back by 2016. Gini coefficient values, used to measure inequalities in distribution, declined modestly from 2007 to 2010 but then remained unchanged through 2016. Results were similar in analyses adjusted for age, sex, and case-mix index.
conclusionsThe beginning of the study period was characterized by a reduction in mean LOS, driven largely by decreases of the longest hospitalizations and greater uniformity in LOS. The latter portion saw steady increases in LOS that were similar across the entire distribution of hospitalizations. If the nadir in LOS has truly been reached, these trends will complicate the long-term health of academic medical centers and their staff, faculty, and trainees.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31295164What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.