Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31295087›Full record

ArticleRadiation research2019

RABiT-II-DCA: A Fully-automated Dicentric Chromosome Assay in Multiwell Plates.

Ekaterina Royba, Mikhail Repin, Sergey Pampou, Charles Karan, David J Brenner, Guy Garty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Sex differences in radiation research.International journal of radiation biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Sex and dose rate effects in automated cytogenetics.Radiation protection dosimetry · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Transcriptomics for radiation biodosimetry: progress and challenges.International journal of radiation biology · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ekaterina RoybaCenter for Radiological Research.
Mikhail RepinCenter for Radiological Research.
Sergey PampouColumbia Genome Center High-Throughput Screening Facility, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York 10032.
Charles KaranColumbia Genome Center High-Throughput Screening Facility, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York 10032.
David J BrennerCenter for Radiological Research.
Guy GartyCenter for Radiological Research.

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201000040CNIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201600040C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We developed a fully-automated dicentric chromosome assay (DCA) in multiwell plates. All operations, from sample loading to chromosome scoring, are performed, without human intervention, by the second-generation Rapid Automated Biodosimetry Tool II (RABiT-II) robotic system, a plate imager and custom software, FluorQuantDic. The system requires small volumes of blood (30 µl per individual) to determine radiation dose received as a result of a radiation accident or terrorist attack. To visualize dicentrics in multiwell plates, we implemented a non-classical protocol for centromere FISH staining at 37°C. The RABiT-II performs rapid analysis of chromosomes after extracting them from metaphase cells. With the use of multiwell plates, many samples can be screened at the same time. Thus, the RABiT-II DCA provides an advantage during triage when risk-based stratification and medical management are required for a large population exposed to unknown levels of ionizing radiation.

Indexed as

AutomationChromosome AberrationsHealthy VolunteersHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceRadioactive Hazard ReleaseRadiometryRobotics

Identifiers

PMID31295087
PMCPMC8567107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.